Laserfiche WebLink
estimated what conditions might be by 2045. To model this, the project team evaluated <br />intersection conditions with a 27% increase in vehicle volumes based on regional land <br />use growth forecast for Kittitas County as well as forecast traffic growth along I-90.§ <br />Even with this growth in traffic volumes, study intersections are expected to remain <br />within acceptable LOS thresholds—LOS B or better in October and LOS C or better in <br />February. These results do not represent peaks in congestion that can occur during busy <br />times for recreational uses or winter storms, or when I-90 is overcapacity. However, they <br />suggest that capacity treatments that add route options or additional modal separation, <br />such as sidewalks and trails or more visible and/or controlled pedestrian street crossings, <br />are more appropriate than roadway widening or construction of traffic signals. <br />For a detailed description of the LOS analysis methodology and full results, see Appendix <br />G. For LOS reports, see Appendix H. <br />§ All count volumes were increased by 27% to reflect a 20-year forecast horizon. This growth rate aligns with <br />countywide population projections from the Washington State Office of Financial Management (OFM) for <br />Kittitas County and is consistent with anticipated traffic growth on I-90, the sole access route to Snoqualmie <br />Pass. The methodology and growth assumption were confirmed by Kittitas County staff. <br />Understanding Congestion in Snoqualmie Pass <br />While the LOS analysis indicates that current and future <br />congestion at study intersections will remain within WSDOT <br />and County capacity thresholds, it is important to recognize that <br />this data reflects only a limited snapshot in time and may not <br />fully capture the lived experience in Snoqualmie Pass. To better <br />understand these conditions, the project team conducted field <br />observations and engaged with community members during a <br />holiday weekend at the height of the ski season. <br />Key takeaways from the field observations included: <br /> ƒCongestion increasing steadily throughout the day <br /> ƒHigh levels of street friction <br /> ƒObservations consistent with feedback from the Stakeholder <br />Planning Group and public outreach, including: <br /> ◦Parking along SR 906 results in pedestrians <br />walking in the roadway <br /> ◦Truck parking along SR 906 creates sight distance <br />issues and other operational challenges <br /> ◦Lack of marked pedestrian crossings misses an <br />opportunity to direct where pedestrian crossings occur <br />and provide more predictability for all users <br /> ◦Peak-period congestion, combined with driver confusion <br />can lead to long queues and user frustration <br /> ◦Insufficient off-street parking supply at peak times, which <br />can lead to congestion as a result of drivers searching <br />for parking and pedestrians walking in the traveled way <br />enroute from distant parking to intended destinations <br />Congestion affects quality of life for residents, visitors, <br />and travelers in Snoqualmie Pass. The safety impacts of <br />congestion are often indirect, but congested conditions <br />can contribute to behaviors such as distracted driving, <br />unpredictable behavior, conflicts between drivers and <br />pedestrians, and challenges for drivers unfamiliar with <br />winter conditions. <br />ė <br />Ē <br />Ęę <br />ĕ <br />ē <br />Ě <br />;“°Áìá <br />>…¾ <br />D…Ý™ģ>…¾ <br />/ÝÎÈģ <br /> <br />- <br />Î <br />Ý <br />á <br /> <br />ģ <br /> <br />d <br />Ý <br />Á <br />z <br /> <br />Á <br />Á <br />Î <br />ø <br />á <br />è <br />Î <br />È <br /> <br />ģ <br /> <br />d <br />Ý <br />… <br />² <br />Á <br />ģ <br /> <br />Z <br />™ <br />9… <br />þ <br />ģ <br /> <br />> <br />È <br />^È <br />Î <br />ø <br />á <br />° <br />Î <br /> <br />ģ <br /> <br />> <br />È <br />-þ …¾Ý ¾ <br />Î …Á Ý ¾ <br />/ <br />È <br />È <br />á <br />’ <br />Ý <br />ì <br />“ <br />¾ <br />ģ <br /> <br /> <br />Ý <br />Áè…ģ <br /> <br />> <br />Î <br />Î <br />Ú <br />; <br /> <br />… <br />Ý <br />È <br /> <br />þ <br />ģ <br /> <br /> <br />Ý <br />'ÎÁ™ݾ <br />Z… <br />Ç <br />Ú <br />… <br />Ý <br />è <br />ģ <br /> <br /> <br />Ý <br />- <br />þ… <br />¾ <br /> <br />Ý <br /> <br />D²ÁÁ ݾ <br />; <br /> <br />È <br />™ <br />… <br />Á <br />Á <br />W <br /> <br />… <br />¾ <br />t <br />… <br />þ <br />^ <br />ģ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />È <br />È <br />þ <br />ģ <br /> <br /> <br />Ý <br /> <br /> <br />¾ <br />ģ <br /> <br />Z <br />™ <br />Ěđė <br />Ěđ <br />>ªÈ™ <br />dD <br />^èì™þģ ݝ… <br />ÎìÈèþģ>²È <br />Ę <br />ę <br />Ěđė <br />đ ġ Ġ <br />D²Áá <br />SR 906 & Guye <br />Peak Lane <br />Exit 53 I-90 WB <br />Ramp & Yellowstone <br />Trail Road <br />SR 906 & <br />Tanner Way <br />SR 906 & <br />Hyak Drive E <br />Exit 54 I-90 WB <br />Ramp & Lake <br />Mardee Road <br />SR 906 & I-90 EB <br />Off Ramp <br />Exit 54 EB Off Ramp <br />& Snoqualmie Drive <br />Figure 22. LOS <br />Evaluated Intersections <br />Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025. <br />38Kittitas County | Snoqualmie Pass Comprehensive Safety Plan