Laserfiche WebLink
Easton Subarea Plan—Public Comment <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE EASTON SUBAREA PLAN <br /> What the Law Allows and Prohibits on Type 3 LAMIRD Land <br /> Under the Growth Management Act and Kittitas County Code <br /> To: Kittitas County Planning Department, Community Development Services and consultants, <br /> As you update the Easton Subarea Plan, I am submitting this comment to request that the plan <br /> include clear, enforceable language defining what can and cannot be built on Type 3 LAMIRD <br /> land. The Growth Management Act, Kittitas County's Comprehensive Plan, and the County <br /> Code already set these standards. They just need to be stated plainly in the subarea plan so <br /> there is no ambiguity going forward. <br /> This comment draws on the legal framework established by RCW 36.70A.070(5), RCW <br /> 36.70A.030(35), Kittitas County Code Chapter 17.15, the Critical Areas Ordinance (KCC Title <br /> 17A), the Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan, and relevant Growth Management Hearings <br /> Board decisions. <br /> 1. WHAT STATE LAW SAYS ABOUT TYPE 3 LAMIRDs <br /> The Growth Management Act created Type 3 LAMIRDs under RCW 36.70A.070(5) as a narrow <br /> exception to general rural land use restrictions. The Legislature authorized counties to allow <br /> limited new commercial development in rural areas, but only when all three of the following <br /> conditions are met: <br /> 1. Isolated small-scale business. The development must be an isolated, small-scale <br /> business. This is not aspirational language—it is a ceiling on what can be built. <br /> 2. Site previously occupied by an existing business. Under RCW 36.70A.070(5)(d), the <br /> new development must utilize a site that was previously occupied by a business. <br /> LAMIRD designations are tied to areas or uses in existence prior to 1991. This is a <br /> threshold eligibility requirement, not a preference. <br /> 3. Conforms to rural character. The new business must conform to the rural character of <br /> the area as defined by the county government. <br /> These are conjunctive requirements. A proposal that fails any one of them is ineligible for Type <br /> 3 LAMIRD development. The Growth Management Hearings Board confirmed in People fora <br /> Liveable Community v. Jefferson County(No. 03-2-0009c, 2003) that LAMIRDs are "intended to <br /> be a one-time recognition of existing areas and uses and are not intended to be used <br /> continuously to meet needs (real or perceived) for additional commercial and industrial lands." <br /> 2. THE HARD LIMITS: WHAT KITTITAS COUNTY CODE ALLOWS <br /> Kittitas County implemented the GMA's Type 3 LAMIRD standards through KCC 17.15.070, <br /> which governs the rural General Commercial zoning district. These are the binding dimensional <br /> and intensity limits for any development on Type 3 LAMIRD land: <br /> These limits exist to implement the GMA's "isolated small-scale business" standard. They are <br /> not starting points for negotiation. They are the maximum development intensity the Legislature <br /> intended for rural commercial land. Any proposal that exceeds these thresholds is, by definition, <br /> not a small-scale business and cannot be approved under Type 3 LAMIRD authority. <br /> Page 1 <br />