My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From:Jackie Wilsey <br />To:Jamey Ayling <br />Subject:Suncadia Development Agreement comment <br />Date:Thursday, January 22, 2026 5:38:05 PM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Kittitas County network. Do not click <br />links, open attachments, fulfill requests, or follow guidance unless you recognize the sender <br />and have verified the content is safe. <br /> <br />Kittitas Community Development Services <br />Attention: Jamey Ayling <br />411 N Ruby St, Suite 2
Ellensburg, WA 98926 <br />Re: Suncadia Development Agreement Extension <br />My name is Jackie Wilsey, and I am a Suncadia homeowner submitting public comment on <br />the proposed extension of the Suncadia Development Agreement. <br />I am not opposed to development, but I respectfully ask that the County review the existing <br />Development Agreement for applicability and compliance before approving any extension. <br />Given the age of the project, it is not clear from the public record which obligations have <br />been completed, which may have expired, and which may remain outstanding. <br />Granting an extension without first documenting compliance makes it harder to enforce <br />earlier commitments later. I ask that any extension be considered only after a written <br />compliance review, and that it not waive or retroactively forgive unmet obligations. <br />Thank you for your time and consideration, <br />Jackie Wilsey
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.