My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
file:///T/...-25-00001%20Suncadia%20Resort/4%20DV-25-00001%20Suncadia%20Resort%20Comments/Suncadia_DA_Comment%201.txt[1/20/2026 9:08:13 AM] <br />Kittitas Community Development Services <br />Attention: Jamey Ayling <br />411 N Ruby St, Suite 2 <br />Ellensburg, WA 98926 <br />Re: Suncadia Development Agreement Extension <br />As a homeowner in Suncadia, I am writing to comment on the proposed extension of the Suncadia Development <br />Agreement. I am not opposed to development; however, I believe accountability under the existing agreement must <br />come first. <br />The Development Agreement includes important commitments related to infrastructure, public access, environmental <br />mitigation, and performance standards. Before additional time or entitlements are granted, the County should verify that <br />these commitments have been met. <br />I respectfully ask the County to require a comprehensive compliance review of the current Development Agreement <br />prior to any extension decision. Such a review should document compliance status and identify any remaining <br />obligations. <br />Proceeding without this step risks weakening enforcement and shifting unresolved responsibilities onto residents or the <br />County. Ensuring compliance first preserves transparency and public trust. <br />Thank you for considering my comments.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.