My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From:Charles Lynch <br />To:Jamey Ayling <br />Cc:Doug Beck <br />Subject:Public Comment on Suncadia DA <br />Date:Sunday, January 25, 2026 1:09:22 PM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Kittitas County network. Do not click links, open attachments, <br />fulfill requests, or follow guidance unless you recognize the sender and have verified the content is safe. <br />Mr. Ayling, <br />I am writing this as a concerned resident of the Suncadia/Tumble Creek development. Many things have changed <br />since the original development plans were filed with the county. The governing body most issues is the Home <br />Owners Association (HOA). The Developer holds controlling interest until 90% of the development is sold, the <br />home owners have a voice but no control. The Developer makes many decisions based on their financial gain; <br />perhaps not in the best interest of the home owners. <br />One such decision was the sale of the water company. Originally, the water company was owned and managed by <br />the Developer. It has since been sold. It was billed to the property owners and the Utility Commission as a no cost <br />change. Since the sale, there has been a deliberate cost shift of future water system development costs for future <br />homes, from developer to the water consumers (current home owners) resulting in increases to our water rates. The <br />water system is not fully developed to cover the future growth and will need further expansion. I assume this will <br />drive additional cost increases to my water bill. <br />I’m not apposed to continued development, I just want the developer held to the original agreements and the <br />homeowners have a equal vote in costs that will be paid by the HOA. <br />Thank you for your consideration in this matter. <br />Charles Lynch <br />91 Jumbo Mine Lane <br />Cle Elum, WA 98922
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.