My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From:Cindy Jobs <br />To:Jamey Ayling <br />Subject:Suncadia Development Agreement Extension <br />Date:Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:46:48 PM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Kittitas County network. Do not click <br />links, open attachments, fulfill requests, or follow guidance unless you recognize the sender <br />and have verified the content is safe. <br /> <br />Jamey, <br />My name is Cindy Jobs, and I am a homeowner in Suncadia. I am submitting this public comment in <br />response to Kittitas County’s request for input regarding the proposed extension of the Suncadia <br />Development Agreement. <br />I am not opposed to development. My request is simply that the County review and verify compliance with <br />the existing Development Agreement before considering any extension. <br />The current Agreement includes obligations related to infrastructure phasing, public amenities and <br />access, environmental mitigation, and other performance commitments that were part of the original <br />approvals. Given the age and maturity of the project, it is not clear from the public record which of theseobligations have been completed, which may have expired by their own terms, and which, if any, remainoutstanding. <br />Granting an extension without first establishing a clear, written record of compliance risks allowsunresolved obligations to be assumed complete or superseded. Once an extension is approved, itbecomes significantly harder to enforce earlier requirements, particularly those tied to timing or early <br />development phases. <br />At a minimum, I respectfully ask that the County require a written compliance review of the existing <br />Development Agreement prior to any consideration of an extension. While the County is not required to <br />grant an extension, the developer must comply with the existing agreement. <br />If the County elects to proceed with an extension process, I ask that it be conditioned on independent <br />verification of compliance, no waiver or retroactive forgiveness of unmet obligations, and clear timelines <br />and reporting requirements for any remaining commitments. <br />Many Suncadia homeowners, including myself, value responsible development and a constructive <br />partnership with Kittitas County. Verifying the applicability and compliance of the existing DevelopmentAgreement before granting additional time is an important step in maintaining transparency,accountability, and public trust. <br />Thank you for your consideration.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.