Laserfiche WebLink
term risk. Approving an extension without a documented compliance determination risks <br />transferring unresolved obligations to homeowners, future purchasers, or the County itself. It <br />also weakens the enforceability of development agreements generally by signaling that <br />compliance is optional rather than required. <br />For these reasons, I respectfully request that the County conduct a comprehensive, written <br />compliance review of the existing Development Agreement before any extension is <br />considered. That review should clearly document the status of each obligation and identify any <br />outstanding items that must be cured. <br />To my knowledge, there have been no enforcement actions or complaints only because the <br />developer controls both the development process and the HOA board, including its ability to <br />communicate with the County and other officials. <br />Please consider the following: <br />1. If an extension is granted, please immediately request that the HOA board be <br />restructured as follows: one set of board seats reserved for the builder and one set of <br />four seats reserved for homeowners, to be filled through open elections. <br />2. Before any extension, it should be expressly conditioned on independent verification of <br />compliance, with no waiver of prior noncompliance, and with clear enforcement <br />mechanisms for any remaining obligations. This approach prioritizes accountability, <br />protects the public interest, and maintains public trust in the development approval <br />process. <br />Thank you for your consideration and for prioritizing enforcement, transparency, and long- <br />term community integrity. <br /> <br />Rex and Polly Bloesser <br />Suncadia | 191 Larkspur Loop 98922 <br />Rex Mobile: 206-331-2800 | Polly Mobile: 425-785-9481 <br />mailto: rexb@enspiresp.com <br /> <br />