My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
file:///T/...01%20Suncadia%20Resort/4%20DV-25-00001%20Suncadia%20Resort%20Comments/Blaine%20Suncadia_Kittitas_DA%202.txt[1/20/2026 9:09:23 AM] <br />Kittitas Community Development Services <br />Attention: Jamey Ayling <br />411 N Ruby St, Suite 2 <br />Ellensburg, WA 98926 <br />Re: Suncadia Development Agreement Extension <br />I am a Suncadia homeowner writing in response to the County’s request for public comment on the proposed extension <br />of the Suncadia Development Agreement. I support responsible and well-planned development. However, I believe it is <br />premature to extend the agreement when it appears the developer has not demonstrated full compliance with its existing <br />obligations. <br />The Development Agreement includes numerous commitments related to infrastructure delivery (I am particularly <br />concerned about Suncadia's requirement to provide improvements to the waste water and sewage infrastructure, and <br />believe that the rapid pace of development has outpaced their required improvements. There are areas throughout the <br />resort that smell or sewage which could indicate that the existing system is already over capacity.), public amenities, <br />environmental mitigation, and cost allocation. These commitments were intended to protect residents, the public, and <br />the County. To date, it is not clear that all such obligations have been fully satisfied or independently verified. <br />Approving an extension without a documented compliance determination risks transferring unresolved obligations to <br />homeowners, future purchasers, or the County itself. It also weakens the enforceability of development agreements <br />generally by signaling that compliance is optional. <br />Before any extension is considered, I respectfully request that the County require a comprehensive written compliance <br />review of the existing Development Agreement. That review should document compliance status in detail and identify <br />any outstanding obligations that must be cured. <br />If the County elects to proceed with an extension process, it should be expressly conditioned on independent verification <br />of compliance, with no waiver of prior noncompliance and with clear enforcement mechanisms for remaining <br />obligations. This approach supports transparency, accountability, and public trust.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.