Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />A B C D E F <br />Commenter Name <br />Comment <br />Date Public Comment Excerpt / Summary <br /> Specific DA / <br />Condition # <br />Comment Topic <br />Area Applicant Response <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />Devon Thomas Jan 19, 2026 <br />The proposed extension should be denied unless and until the developer demonstrates full <br />compliance with the existing Development Agreement. Unresolved obligations should not be carried <br />forward through an extension. Doing so places the burden <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the comment opposing the extension. The proposed extension does not waive compliance <br />obligations and maintains enforceability. <br />Patricia Thurman <br />I believe it is premature to extend the agreement when it appears the developer has not <br />demonstrated full compliance with its existing obligations. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the comment and confirms that accountability mechanisms remain in place under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Sally Vellon Jan 18, 2026 I believe accountability under the existing agreement must come first. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the comment and confirms that accountability mechanisms remain in place under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Jackie Wilsey Jan 22, 2026 <br />I am not opposed to development, but I respectfully ask that the County review the existing <br />Development Agreement for applicability and compliance before approving any extension. Given the <br />age of the project, it is not clear from the public record which obligations have been completed, <br />which may have expired, and which may remain outstanding. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the comment and confirms that accountability mechanisms remain in place under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Rob Wilson Jan 21, 2026 <br />I would request you not approve an extension at this time. My reasoning is I believe all long-term <br />developments should be required to pass a comprehensive, and preferably independent, review as to <br />whether or not they have complied with previous county and Suncadia covenants and requirements <br />before being allowed to continue to proceed. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability As noted in other responses, the Applicant is committed to continuing to fulfill all required commitments. <br />Kathleen Woodward Jan 23, 2026 <br />Granting an extension without first establishing a clear, written record of compliance risks allowing <br />unresolved obligations to be assumed complete or superseded. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the comment and confirms that accountability mechanisms remain in place under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Kathy Ziegler Jan 21, 2026 <br />I am not opposed to development; however, I believe accountability under the existing agreement <br />must come first. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the comment and confirms that accountability mechanisms remain in place under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />No Name "Suncadia DA Comment 1" <br />The Development Agreement includes important commitments related to infrastructure, public <br />access, environmental mitigation, and performance standards. Before additional time or entitlements <br />are granted, the County should verify that these commitments have been met. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance / <br />Accountability <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for a documented compliance review. The Development Agreement has been <br />administered through ongoing County oversight, and obligations have been addressed through applicable approvals. The <br />proposed extension does not excuse unfinished obligations. <br />Response to Comments Received after the cutoff date/time