My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />A B C D E F <br />Commenter Name <br />Comment <br />Date Public Comment Excerpt / Summary <br /> Specific DA / <br />Condition # <br />Comment Topic <br />Area Applicant Response <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />Peder Davis <br />I am not opposed to responsible development. My request is that the County review and verify <br />compliance with the existing Development Agreement before considering any extension. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance <br />Verification <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for confirmation of compliance with the existing Development Agreement. Since <br />approval of the original agreement, required obligations have been addressed through phased development approvals, <br />inspections, and County acceptance of improvements. The proposed extension does not waive existing obligations but <br />preserves the County’s ability to enforce applicable requirements. The Applicant will continue to work with the County to <br />ensure compliance with all on-going conditions through plat approvals and other time stamped conditions required under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Richard & Linda Dix Jan 24, 2026 <br />We have experienced the continued erosion of the Development's original vision, resulting in <br />misrepresentations, unfulfilled promises and risk of diminished value of our significant investment in <br />the community. Our request is that Kittitas Community Development Services perform a <br />comprehensive compliance review prior to any decision granting the extension of a development <br />agreement. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance <br />Verification <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for confirmation of compliance with the existing Development Agreement. Since <br />approval of the original agreement, required obligations have been addressed through phased development approvals, <br />inspections, and County acceptance of improvements. The proposed extension does not waive existing obligations but <br />preserves the County’s ability to enforce applicable requirements. The Applicant will continue to work with the County to <br />ensure compliance with all on-going conditions through plat approvals and other time stamped conditions required under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Steve & Debbie Dowd Jan 19, 2026 <br />We are concerned that the developer(s) have not fully complied with the Development Agreement <br />currently in effect. Granting an extension before resolving unmet obligations would undermine the <br />purpose of the agreement and weaken accountability. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance <br />Verification <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for confirmation of compliance with the existing Development Agreement. Since <br />approval of the original agreement, required obligations have been addressed through phased development approvals, <br />inspections, and County acceptance of improvements. The proposed extension does not waive existing obligations but <br />preserves the County’s ability to enforce applicable requirements. The Applicant will continue to work with the County to <br />ensure compliance with all on-going conditions through plat approvals and other time stamped conditions required under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Fred Mattison Jan 24, 2026 <br />I'm not aware of any requirement to extend the MPR agreement and especially a 15-year extension <br />of the pain to taxpayers. Any extension will also extend the developers' ability to mismanage the <br />associations per the CC&R's. If you are going to consider any extension of the MPR, Kittitas County <br />should review the application just like a new application for development. All of the studies are older <br />than 20 years. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance <br />Verification <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for confirmation of compliance with the existing Development Agreement. Since <br />approval of the original agreement, required obligations have been addressed through phased development approvals, <br />inspections, and County acceptance of improvements. The proposed extension does not waive existing obligations but <br />preserves the County’s ability to enforce applicable requirements. <br />The specific comments related to other items in the letter are not related to the Development Agreement and as such, a <br />response is not provided. <br />Kurt & Laurie Fresh Jan 20, 2026 <br />Before considering an extension, we respectfully request that the County conduct a formal, written <br />compliance review of the existing Development Agreement. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance <br />Verification <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for confirmation of compliance with the existing Development Agreement. Since <br />approval of the original agreement, required obligations have been addressed through phased development approvals, <br />inspections, and County acceptance of improvements. The proposed extension does not waive existing obligations but <br />preserves the County’s ability to enforce applicable requirements. The Applicant will continue to work with the County to <br />ensure compliance with all on-going conditions through plat approvals and other time stamped conditions required under the <br />Development Agreement. <br />Larry Gottlieb Jan 25, 2026 <br />We are writing to request that the County please perform a review of Suncadia's full compliance with <br />its obligations to the Suncadia homeowners under the Development Agreement before deciding <br />whether to agree with Suncadia's request for an extension. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Compliance <br />Verification <br />The Applicant acknowledges the request for a formal compliance review. The Development Agreement has been implemented <br />through multiple County-reviewed permits and approvals that confirm compliance with applicable obligations. The proposed <br />extension does not modify or excuse previously completed or applicable requirements. <br />Stacy Heintz Jan 19, 2026 <br />Granting an extension without first documenting compliance makes it harder and potentially more <br />expensive for us to enforce unfulfilled commitments after the fact. <br />DA Recitals D thru I; DA <br />Section 4.2 Timing of <br />Construction and <br />Completion. <br />No Specific Conditions <br />Stated <br />Process / <br />Enforcement <br />The Applicant acknowledges the concern regarding enforceability of commitments. The proposed extension maintains the <br />enforceability of applicable Development Agreement provisions and does not eliminate or retroactively forgive any completed <br />or ongoing obligations. <br />Steve Hunter Jan 18, 2026 <br />I am a homeowner in Suncadia since 2008. I support the extension of the Suncadia Development <br />Agreement. N/A Extension Support The Applicant appreciates the comment in support of the proposed Development Agreement extension. <br />Catherine Jackson Jan 18, 2026 <br />Thoughtful, orderly process has always been among our neighborhood’s strengths; I believe this <br />reinforces that. N/A Process / General The Applicant appreciates the comment and support for a thoughtful and orderly review process.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.