My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
02. February
>
2026-02-17 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
DV-25-00001 Suncadia Resort Master File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 12:34:38 PM
Creation date
2/12/2026 12:29:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/17/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing continued from February 3, 2026, to consider a 15-year extension to the existing Development Agreement for Suncadia DV-25-00001. The record is open.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
141467
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From:Kathleen Woodward <br />To:Jamey Ayling <br />Subject:Suncadia Development Agreement Extension <br />Date:Friday, January 23, 2026 10:03:42 AM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Kittitas County network. Do not click links, open attachments, <br />fulfill requests, or follow guidance unless you recognize the sender and have verified the content is safe. <br />Kittitas Community Development Services <br />Attention: Jamey Ayling <br />411 N Ruby St, Suite 2 <br />Ellensburg, WA 98926 <br />Re: Suncadia Development Agreement Extension <br />To Jamey Ayling et al, <br />I am a homeowner in Tumble Creek/ Suncadia and am submitting this public comment in response to Kittitas <br />County’s request for input regarding the proposed extension of the Suncadia Development Agreement. <br />My request is that the County review and verify compliance with the existing Development Agreement before <br />considering any extension(s). <br />The current agreement includes obligations related to infrastructure phasing, public amenities access, environmental <br />mitigation, and other performance commitments that were part of the original approvals. Given the age and maturity <br />of the project, it is not clear from the public record which of these obligations have been completed, which may have <br />expired and if any remain outstanding. Once an extension is approved, it becomes significantly harder to enforce <br />earlier requirements, particularly those tied to timing or early phases of <br />development. <br /> Granting an extension without first establishing a clear, written record of compliance risks allowing unresolved <br />obligations to be assumed completed or superseded. <br /> If the County elects to proceed with an extension process, I ask that it be conditioned on independent verification of <br />compliance; no waiver or retroactive forgiveness of unmet obligations, clear timelines, reporting requirements. <br />Prioritizing public transparency and accountability are key factors in maintaining the public trust. <br />Thank you, <br />Kathleen Woodward <br />Kathleen Woodward <br />Kw@kathleenwoodward.com <br />www.kathleenwoodward.com <br />206.719.1036
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.