Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br /> <br />Community Engagement <br />Washington State’s Local Plan Guidance requires that countfes involve a broad range of stakeholders in developing <br />homeless housing plans, including people with lived experience of homelessness, local governments, service <br />providers, and the public. But more than a requirement, community engagement is essentfal to building a plan that <br />is practfcal, responsive, and community owned. <br />We approached engagement with a clear belief: those closest to the problem are closest to the solutfon. <br />Homelessness touches every part of our county, and addressing it requires perspectfves from across the spectrum, <br />those with lived experience, frontline workers, community partners, and everyday residents. Their insights shaped <br />not only the prioritfes of this plan, but the way we talk about homelessness, the way we serve, and the values we <br />hold. <br />Between September and November 2024, more than 280 individuals partfcipated in shaping the Kittitas County <br />2025–2030 Homeless Housing Plan: <br />• 240 residents completed a community survey, distributed both online and in person through trusted <br />community channels. <br />• Over 30 people joined facilitated focus groups, including individuals with lived experience, nonprofit <br />providers, government representatfves, healthcare workers, educators, and community members. <br />• Stakeholders engaged through targeted meetfngs with housing providers, city officials, and regional <br />partners. <br /> <br />What We Heard <br />Survey responses reflected shared concerns across demographic lines and geographies: <br />• Broad support for expanding affordable <br />housing, emergency shelter, and behavioral <br />health services. <br />• Frustratfon with stfgma, service gaps, and <br />confusing systems that prevent people from <br />getting help. <br />• A divide in public opinion around personal <br />responsibility versus systemic causes of <br />homelessness. <br />• A clear call for collaboratfve solutfons and better public educatfon to shift understanding and engagement. <br /> <br />From the focus groups, five cross-cutting themes emerged: <br />• The system is too hard to access: partfcipants described long waits, strict rules, and complex requirements <br />that don’t match people’s real lives. <br />“It’s not that people are unwilling to engage—it’s that <br />they’re tired of being treated badly or getting stuck in a <br />system that doesn’t work.” <br />—Service provider partfcipant. <br /> <br />People want help and want to get sober, but it’s hard to <br />stay sober on the streets.” <br />—Partfcipant with lived experience.