My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2025-141
>
Meetings
>
2025
>
08. August
>
2025-08-05 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Resolution 2025-141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 9:12:40 AM
Creation date
8/21/2025 9:11:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
8/5/2025
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Adopting the Kittitas County Tourism Infrastructure Project Applications
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
133789
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
retated to util.ities work has been compteted as a part of some initial. fietdhouse design <br />workthat compteted in late 2023 bythe Hetix Design Group. <br />ln terms of project readiness, the project is located on city owned property, a significant <br />portion of the project funding is atready in ptace, outreach work has been done with <br />community stakehotders to hetp identifu amenities that need to be included in the buitding <br />as wel,t as space needs, the staffing ptan is to retocate staff from the Stan Bassett Youth <br />Center to the fietdhouse, a draft'Request for Quatifications'to construct the buitding is <br />al.ready compteted, and city has hired the Pacifica Law Group, a firm with a tot of work <br />experience devetoping and working with pubtic/private partnerships, to hetp watk the city <br />through the process of getting a contractor setected and the project underway. <br />2. Risk Management <br />ldentify potentiat risks or chattenges for the project (e.g., detays, budget overruns| and <br />provide strategies to mitigate these risks. <br />pursuant to the authority under Chapter 35.42 RCW the city anticipates the most tikety <br />devetopment scenario as fottows: the city intends to negotiate a series of agreements with <br />the setected devetoper, inctuding a site ground tease, a devetopment agreement, and a <br />facitity tease. The devetoper witt design and construct the facitity pursuant to a design and <br />specifications approved by the city at its sote cost and expense. The city witt tease back the <br />fietdhouse from the devel.oper, with an option to purchase the compteted fietdhouse at any <br />point during the term of the ground tease. Ownership of the fietdhouse woutd revert to the <br />city at the end of the ground lease term untess the city has eartier exercised its purchase <br />option. ln the devetopment of the lease, the city can estabtish a not to exceed project cost, <br />thereby ptacing project risks associated with cost overruns on the devetoper. Under this <br />statute there is minimat risk to the city. <br />This partnership modet reduces risk to County todging tax support. The purchase options <br />can onty be exercised after the facitity is futty constructed, thereby protecting the County's <br />investment in the Project. <br />Vl. Tourism Metrics and Success Measurement <br />For capitat projects, we recognize that traditionat short-term tourism metrics such as <br />visitor counts, overnight stays, or immediate revenue generation may not be measurabte <br />during the construction phase or shortty after completion. However, it is essentiat that <br />appticants demonstrate how the proposed project witl support tourism in the tong term and <br />how success witt be evatuated over time.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.