R2025-134 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

fhe water system. Is this proposed development within the service area of the Evergreen Valley Water System?" 11.4.1. Applicant Response: We are confirming that the Evergreen Valley Water System will be able to provide a suffioient amount of drinking water for the proposed project. This proposed dwelopment is within the service area of the Evergrcen Valley Water System. The expected usage for this development, based on the 61 proposed lots multiplied by the average household water usage of 200 gallons per day, is 12,200 gallons of domestic water per day. See the attached letter from Evergreen Valley Water System confirming their willingness and ability to serye this development. 11.4.2. County Response: Staffprovided the comments to the applicant. 11.5. WashingLon Deparftnent o.f Archeology and Historic Preservation; "Our statewide predictive mod-el indicates that there is a moderate to high probability of encountering oultural resources within the proposed project area Further, the scale of the proposed ground disturbing actions would destroy any archaeological resources present. Identification during consfiuction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly construction delays and damage to the resource. lAerefore, we r€commend a professional archaeological survey ofthe projeot area be conducted and a rcport be pnrduced prior to ground disturbing activities. This report should meet DAHP's Standards for Cultural Resource Reporting. 11.5.1. We also recommend that any historic buildings or sbuctures (45 yean in age or older) located within the project area are evaluated for eligibility for listing in the National Register ofHistoric Places on Historic Property Inventory ftIPI) forms. We highly encourage the SEPA lead agency to ensure that these evaluations are written by a cultural resource professional meeting the SOI Professional Qualification Standards inArchiteotural History." 11.5.2. Applicant Response: See applicants' rrsponse under the Confederated Thibes of the Colville Reservation. I L5.3. County Response: The SEPA Determination has been conditioned to include an IDP and a cultural resource study. I1.6. Washingrpn Department of Fish and Wildlife: "WDFW recomnends that all sfieams and their riparian management zones or buffers be identified on the plat maps; KCC 174.04.030 identifies a 50' buffer on Ns streams. We also request that prior to any road building or grading near the sheams, you contact WDFW to determine if a Hydraulic Projeot Approval (IIPA) is required. 11.6.1. WDFW is generatty supportive of the Norltrern (21 parcels) and North-Central (171934) parcels being designated and signed as unbuildable critical areas to mitigate for the loss of Uafitat in the South Q0202) and South-Centrat (12065) parcels. If the Recreational Open Space areas are to be designated as mitigation forttre impaots to Priority Habitats and Species associated with the high density Planned Unit Development, motorized recreational uses should be better understood. WDFW recommends formal recogrrition of these properties as Native Growth ProtectionAreas (KCC 17A.01.090.2) such that the protection measures are formally recorded on the plats and tittes and can be enforced as a pennanent mitigation measure. 11.6.2. We understand there are existing uses and established fails throughout the properties, The locations and timing ofmotorized use will have varying effects on some prior$ species and WDFW requests the opportunity to work collaboratively with the proponents on a recreation PD-2+0000 I /sP-24-00004 Roslyn Ridge West Page 8 of16