My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution_2025 Kittitas County Hazard Mitigation Plan
>
Meetings
>
2025
>
08. August
>
2025-08-05 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Resolution_2025 Kittitas County Hazard Mitigation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2025 12:07:24 PM
Creation date
7/31/2025 12:04:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
8/5/2025
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution to Adopt the 2025 Kittitas County Hazard Mitigation Plan as Approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
Order
11
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
133785
Type
Resolution
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />Kittitas County, Washington <br /> <br /> <br />Chapter 5: Mitigation Strategy 226 <br />Criteria Description <br />L Legal <br />It is critical that the jurisdiction or implementing agency have the legal authority to <br />implement and enforce a mitigation action. <br />• Does the community have the authority to implement the proposed <br />action? <br />• Are the proposed laws, ordinances, and resolutions in place to implement <br />the action? <br />• Are there any potential legal consequences? <br />• Is there any potential community liability? <br />• Is the action likely to be challenged by those who may be negatively <br />affected? <br />• Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the <br />NFIP? <br />E Economic <br />Budget constraints can significantly deter the implementation of mitigation <br />actions. It is important to evaluate whether an action is cost-effective, as <br />determined by a cost benefit review, and possible to fund. <br />• Are there currently sources of funds that can be used to implement the <br />action? <br />• What benefits will the action provide? <br />• Does the cost seem reasonable for the size of the problem and the likely <br />benefits? <br />• What burden will be placed on the tax base or local economy to <br />implement this action? <br />• Does the action contribute to other community economic goals such as <br />capital improvements or economic development? <br />• What proposed actions should be considered but be “tabled” for <br />implementation until outside sources of funding are available? <br />E Environmental <br />Sustainable mitigation actions that do not have adverse effect on the environment, <br />comply with federal, state, and local environmental regulations, and are consistent <br />with the community’s environmental goals, have mitigation benefits while being <br />environmentally sound. <br />• How will this action affect the environment (i.e., land, water, endangered <br />species)? <br />• Will this action comply with local, state, and federal environmental laws <br />and regulations? <br />• Is this action consistent with community environmental goals? <br />E Equity <br />Does not create an opportunity for unequal distribution of resources; racism; affect <br />a particular segment of the population, including communities of color, <br />communities that face discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation or gender <br />identity, individuals with disabilities, individuals who identify with certain religion, <br />individuals with Limited English Proficiency, or rural communities, etc. <br />• Is the action consistent and systematically fair?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.