Laserfiche WebLink
the water system. Is this proposed development within the service area of the Evergreen Valley <br />Water System?" <br />11.4.1. Applicant Response: We are confirming that the Evergreen Valley Water System will be <br />able to provide a sufficient amount of drinking water for the proposed project. This proposed <br />development is within the service area of the Evergreen Valley Water System. The expected <br />usage for this development, based on the 61 proposed lots multiplied by the average <br />household water usage of 200 gallons per day, is 12,200 gallons of domestic water per day. <br />See the attached letter from Evergreen Valley Water System confirming their willingness and <br />ability to serve this development. <br />11.4.2. County Response: Staff provided the comments to the applicant. <br />11.5. Washington Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation: "Our statewide <br />predictive model indicates that there is a moderate to high probability of encountering cultural <br />resources within the proposed project area. Further, the scale of the proposed ground disturbing <br />actions would destroy any archaeological resources present. Identification during construction is <br />not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries often result in costly <br />construction delays and damage to the resource. Therefore, we recommend a professional <br />archaeological survey of the project area be conducted and a report be produced prior to ground <br />disturbing activities. This report should meet DAHP's Standards for Cultural Resource Reporting. <br />11.5.1. We also recommend that any historic buildings or structures (45 years in age or older) <br />located within the project area are evaluated for eligibility for listing in the National Register <br />of Historic Places on Historic Property Inventory (BPI) forms. We highly encourage the SEPA <br />lead agency to ensure that these evaluations are written by a cultural resource professional <br />meeting the SOI Professional Qualification Standards in Architectural History." <br />11.5.2. Applicant Response: See applicants' response under the Confederated Tribes of the <br />Colville Reservation. <br />11.5.3. County Response: The SEPA Determination has been conditioned to include an IDP and a <br />cultural resource study. <br />11.6. Washington D artment of Fish and Wildlife: "WDFW recommends that all streams and <br />their riparian management zones or buffers be identified on the plat maps; KCC 17A.04.030 <br />identifies a 50' buffer on Ns streams. We also request that prior to any road building or grading <br />near the streams, you contact WDFW to determine if a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) is <br />required. <br />11.6.1. WDFW is generally supportive of the Northern (21 parcels) and North-Central (171934) <br />parcels being designated and signed as unbuildable critical areas to mitigate for the loss of <br />habitat in the South (20202) and South -Central (12065) parcels. If the Recreational Open <br />Space areas are to be designated as mitigation for the impacts to Priority Habitats and Species <br />associated with the high density Planned Unit Development, motorized recreational uses <br />should be better understood. WDFW recommends formal recognition of these properties as <br />Native Growth Protection Areas (KCC 17A.01.090.2) such that the protection measures are <br />formally recorded on the plats and titles and can be enforced as a permanent mitigation <br />measure. <br />11.6.2. We understand there are existing uses and established trails throughout the properties. The <br />locations and timing of motorized use will have varying effects on some priority species and <br />WDFW requests the opportunity to work collaboratively with the proponents on a recreation <br />PD-24-00001/SP-24-00004 <br />Roslyn Ridge West <br />Page 8 of 16 <br />