Laserfiche WebLink
Kittitas County, WA <br />§ 17A.07.030 CRITICAL AREAS § 17A.07.030 <br />Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/KI6857 on 2025-05-15 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />9. Increased buffers. The Director shall increase the wetland buffers widths where the standard buffer is <br />inadequate to prevent significant adverse environmental impacts or address hazards associated with <br />the site or the proposed development. The Director may increase the buffer up to a maximum of two <br />times the standard width. When determining how much to increase the standard buffer, the Director <br />shall consider the following conditions: <br />a. Whether the wetland provides habitat for state priority or federally listed endangered, threatened, <br />or sensitive species for which a habitat management plan indicates a larger buffer is necessary to <br />protect habitat values for such species; or <br />b. Whether the land adjacent to the wetland is susceptible to severe erosion, and erosion control <br />best management practices will not effectively prevent adverse wetland impacts. <br />10. (Reserved) <br />11. Buffer averaging. The Director may allow averaging of the standard buffer widths in accordance with <br />an approved critical areas report on a case-by-case basis. With buffer averaging, the buffer width is <br />reduced in one location and increased in another location to maintain the same overall buffer area. In <br />such cases, the minimum width of the buffer at any given point shall be at least seventy-five percent <br />(75%) of the standard width, or twenty-five (25) feet, whichever is greater. Proposals for buffer <br />averaging shall meet all the following: <br />a. The wetland buffer has not been averaged or reduced by any prior actions; <br />b. No feasible site design could be accomplished without buffer averaging; <br />c. The wetland contains variations in sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics or the <br />character of the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation, and the wetland would benefit from <br />a wider buffer in places and would not be adversely impacted by a narrower buffer in other <br />places; <br />d. The averaging will not have a significant adverse impact on wetland functions and values; and <br />e. The area that is added to the buffer to offset the reduction will be well-vegetated. The Director <br />may require vegetation enhancement if needed to ensure this criterion is met. <br />12. Mitigation for buffer averaging. Prior to approving a request for wetland buffer averaging, the Director <br />shall ensure the development is designed to separate and screen the wetland from impacts such as <br />noise, glare, vegetation trampling, intrusion, etc to the degree feasible. The site design shall consider <br />the varying degrees of impacts of different land uses. For example, parking lots, store entrances, and <br />roads generally have higher noise and glare impacts than the rear of a store. Site screening should take <br />advantage of natural topography or existing vegetation, wherever possible. Where natural screening <br />is not available, berms, landscaping, and structural screens should be implemented as may be required <br />by the Director (e.g., orient buildings to screen parking lots and store entrances from critical areas). <br />13. Allowed buffer uses. The Director may allow the following alterations and development within a <br />wetland buffer provided that they are conducted in a manner so as to minimize impacts to the buffer <br />and adjacent wetland, including wetland functions and values: <br />a. Conservation or restoration activities aimed at protecting or enhancing the soil, water, <br />vegetation, or wildlife.