Laserfiche WebLink
construction, a Forest Practices Application will be acquired prior to the <br />beginning of any work on site, if said application is required." <br />12.1.2 Hearing Examiner Finding: CDS staff conditioned the MDNS to require the <br />applicants to contact DNR on the applicability of a Forest Practices <br />Application. <br />12.2 WSDOT Aviation: WSDOT Aviation stated they have no comment. <br />12.2.1 Applicant response: "Acknowledg" <br />12.2.2 Hearing Examiner Finding: CDS staff provided these comments to the <br />applicant. <br />12.3 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: WDFW commented on the project's <br />impact on fish and wildlife habitats. WDFW specifically has concerns related to the <br />typing of the stream in the NW corner of 707835 and requested an opportunity to <br />review with the applicant and/or consultants. Additionally, WDFW commented on <br />their desire for future development to not encroach on habitat areas or buffers. <br />12.3.1 Applicant response: "Per WDFW's request, we met with Scott Downes of the <br />WDFW and our environmental consultant Ed Sewall on September 15, 2023. <br />The stream in question was deemed Type Ns (seasonal non -fish bearing) by <br />Scott Downes. Here are his comments: "The stream typing reflected in your <br />critical areas report is correct; you have a Type F (fish -bearing) -Coal Creek on <br />your eastern boundary and then a Type Ns (seasonal non -fish bearing) in your <br />NW corner. The majority of the lots are generously sized. Even the smallest of <br />the parcels, Lot 8, provides sufficient space for fire -fighting activities and will <br />not require fire fighters to enter the buffer to protect the structure. The property <br />owners are aware of fire -wising techniques such as vegetation management <br />and appropriate building material selection to reduce fire risk. Additionally, <br />we acknowledge receipt of the following comments from Scott Downes: "For <br />the firewire discussion, keeping the overstory trees is a priority, so trees could <br />be limbed up some, but other elements along the fish stream such as shrubs <br />and logs are important." <br />12.3.2 Hearing Examiner Finding: CDS Staff provided these comments to the <br />applicant. Scott Downes of WDFW concurred with the findings of Ed Sewall's <br />report regarding the Type Ns stream. <br />12.4 Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation: Confederated Tribes of the Colville <br />Reservation stated there are known cultural resources nearby and the parcel is <br />considered "Very High Risk" for an inadvertent discovery. Colville requested a <br />cultural resource survey be completed prior to project implementation. <br />12.4.1 Applicant Response: "The property owners will complete a Cultural <br />Resource Survey as requested and have an IDP in place prior to ground - <br />disturbing activity. We have identified three qualified firms to perform the <br />archaeological sampling and are in the process of reviewing bids." <br />12.4.2 Hearing Examiner Finding: CDS staff has conditioned the MDNS to require <br />a cultural resource survey of the project area. <br />LP-23-00003 <br />McAllister Summit Long Plat <br />Page 4 of 13 <br />