My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-03-18-minutes-200pm-public-hearing
>
Meetings
>
2025
>
04. April
>
2025-04-01 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2025-03-18-minutes-200pm-public-hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 12:05:14 PM
Creation date
3/27/2025 12:04:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
4/1/2025
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
129428
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
03/18/2025 MINUTES 3 <br />proceed with the hearing of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and <br />Non-Project rezone. <br /> MAUREEN MITCHELL, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING MARDEE LAKE, INC. asked the <br />Board to reject the SEPA appeal and approve the proposed <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment. She felt the MDNS that was issued by <br />Staff was an appropriate decision under the SEPA guidelines. She <br />said she’s never heard of an EIS being required at this stage for a <br />non-project application. She said there were no issues with the <br />critical areas report, as they’d prepared it at the request of <br />Community Development Services. <br /> CONNOR JOHNSON, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, REPRESENTING THE APPELLANT, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, said the <br />State was not asking for an issuance of an EIS, but they’re <br />requesting additional analysis relating to fish and wildlife, due to <br />the potential impacts. He said development needs to be considered if <br />an MDNS is issued because wildlife needs to be appropriately <br />mitigated, and that an EIS would provide a more of an in-depth <br />analysis. They appellants didn’t believe all buffers had been taken <br />into account and recommended the Board remand back to Staff. They <br />would like to be more involved and offered to provide Staff with <br />their expertise. <br /> SCOTT DOWNS, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, REGIONAL LAND USE LEAD, reviewed a power-point presentation with <br />information on how migration routes work and its importance for the <br />Board of County Commissioners consideration. <br /> COMMISSIONER WACHSMITH moved to affirm Community Development <br />Services SEPA Threshold Determination and to proceed with the <br />hearing of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Non-Project <br />Rezone (CP-24-00001). VICE-CHAIRMAN WRIGHT seconded. <br /> VICE-CHAIRMAN WRIGHT felt there was no reason to not uphold Staff’s <br />MDNS, as its non-project rezone, and was pleased both sides <br />supported the critical areas report. <br /> <br />Motion carried 2-0. <br /> COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ITEM CP-24-00001 JAMEY AYLING, PLANNING MANAGER, reviewed a Staff Report and the <br />Mardee Lake Non-Project Rezone request (CP-24-00001). He said the <br />request was for a rezone and map amendment to four parcels currently <br />zoned Forest and Range with a Rural Working Land Use, rezoned to <br />Rural Recreation zoning and land use designation. It would allow <br />the current use of the property to be consistent and compatible with <br />the zoning code of rural recreation, as well as allow future
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.