Laserfiche WebLink
15A.03.090 Review actions on project permit applications. <br />Project review shall include the following steps: <br />1. A notice of determination of completeness to the applicant. <br />2. A notice of application to the public and agencies with jurisdiction. <br />3. No more than one consolidated open record hearing and no more than one closed <br />record appeal. <br />4. Provisions may be allowed by the local jurisdiction for any public meeting or required <br />open record hearing that may be held on the project by another local, state, regional, <br />federal, or other agency, in accordance with provisions of Chapter 36.7013 RCW. <br />5. A single report by a representative of the administrator, stating all the decisions made as <br />of the date of the report on all project permits included in the consolidated permit <br />process. The report shall state any mitigation required or proposed under the <br />development regulations or the agency's authority under The report <br />may be the local permit. If a threshold determination other than a determination of <br />significance has not been issued by Kittitas County, the report shall include or append <br />this determination. <br />6. A notice of decision. <br />7. Except as otherwise provided for in this title, Kittitas County shall issue its notice of final <br />decision on a project permit application in accordance with KCC 15A.03.120. within 20 <br />days a4eF Kittitas CeLinty notifies the app"Eant that the applicatien ;5 EerAp! (Ord. <br />2000-07; Ord. 98-10, 1998) <br />15A.03.100 Criteria for review of all project actions. <br />Project review should start from the fundamental land use planning choices made in local <br />comprehensive plans and regulations, include review of consistency and land use impacts. <br />1. Applicable comprehensive plans and regulations that identify the type of land use for <br />the site, specify density, and identify and provide for funding of public facilities needed <br />to serve the proposed development and site should be the standard for project review. <br />Consistency should be determined in the project review process by considering four <br />factors found in applicable plans or regulations: <br />a. The type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be <br />allowed under certain circumstances, such as planned unit developments <br />and conditional uses, if the criteria for their approval have been satisfied; <br />b. The level of development allowed, such as units per acre or other measures <br />of density; <br />c. Infrastructure, such as the adequacy of public facilities and services <br />identified in the comprehensive plan, to serve the proposed project; and <br />d. The character of the proposed development, such as compliance with <br />specific development standards. <br />2. In determining consistency, the determinations made pursuant to this title shall be <br />controlling. <br />3. Project review should not require additional studies or mitigation under Chapter <br />(SEPA) where existing regulations have adequately addressed a proposed project's <br />probable specific adverse environmental impacts. <br />4. Supplemental authority as specified by Chapter 43.21 C RCW should be used to the <br />extent that existing requirements do not adequately address a project's specific <br />probable adverse environmental impacts. <br />