Laserfiche WebLink
Kittitas PUD <br /> Kittitas PUD states they have no comments. <br /> Colville Tribe <br /> CCT requests that during implementation that there be an inadvertent discovery plan or(IDP)in <br /> place to ensure compliance with all Section 106 and relevant cultural resource laws both federally <br /> and to the state of Washington. <br /> Kittitas County Public Works: <br /> KCPW provided comments solely regarding access,and no transportation concurrency management <br /> application would be required for this project. Since this project location is not identified by the Federal <br /> Emergency Management Agency as within a Special Flood Hazard Area,a floodplain development <br /> permit is not required. <br /> Snoqualmie Tribe <br /> Snoqualmie Tribe stated they had no substantive comments on the proposal based on the APE but reserve <br /> the right to modify their current position. <br /> Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: <br /> WDFW commented in regards to the concern of Priority Habitat Species program as shrub steppe habitat. <br /> WDFW requests that a habitat management plan be developed including plans for future expansion of the <br /> operation and their impact to shrub steppe,but also plans for habitat restoration once the current mining <br /> areas completed. <br /> Staff Response: Staff shares some of the same concerns as the WDFW,The proposed Rezone and <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment is not a project specific application. Any future development proposals <br /> on the property would require critical areas review. <br /> Five Citizen comments were also received during the comment period. <br /> Hutchinson <br /> Thomas <br /> Cascadia Law <br /> Bosman <br /> Blackmore <br /> VII. PROJECT ANALYSIS <br /> In review of this proposal it is important to consider the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan,applicable <br /> county code,public and agency comments,any identified environmental concerns and state and federal <br /> requirements. Identified below is planning staff s analysis and consistency review for the subject application. <br /> Comprehensive Plan Consistency: <br /> The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan. As referenced <br /> above in Section IV of this staff report,the following Comprehensive Plan GPOs apply to this proposal:RR-G22, <br /> RR-G23,RR-G24,and RR-G25. This proposal is consistent with the intent of the Rural and Resource Lands of <br /> Kittitas County. <br /> Consistency with the provisions of KCC Title 12 Roads and Bridges: <br /> This proposal is for a non-project rezone,therefore there will be no impact on existing infrastructure.The <br /> 5 <br />