Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 2: RANGE OF ALTERNATIVES <br />2.7 Alternative 5: South <br />Alternative 5 was proposed as a means to assess <br />non -interstate enhancements south of the <br />1-90 corridor, aiming to meet the needs of the <br />community. This alternative explores the possibility <br />of upgrading the current roadway serving as an <br />1-90 bypass route to accommodate increased traffic <br />volumes and speeds during times of congestion <br />on 1-90. The upgraded corridor would enhance <br />capacity and connectivity between Easton and Cie <br />Elum, bypassing the 1-90 roadway. The proposed <br />realignment would start at Exit 70 and reconnect <br />to 1-90 at Exit 85. To achieve this, a total of four <br />lanes (adding one new lane in each direction) <br />would be incorporated into Lake Easton Road, <br />Railroad Street, Nelson Siding Road, Westside <br />Drive, and Lower Peoh Point Road. Some segments <br />of the alignment might require the construction <br />of entirely new roads, each featuring two lanes <br />in each direction. These roadways would consist <br />of two 12-foot lanes in each direction with 6-foot <br />shoulders adjacent to each lane. Currently, existing <br />roadways primarily feature one lane in each <br />direction, with lanes approximately 12 feet wide. <br />Figure 2-11 shows a conceptual cross-section for <br />Alternative 5. Figure 2-12 presents the general <br />alignment for the proposed alternative. <br />Considerations <br />• Provides an alternative route for Nelson and <br />South Cie Elum. <br />• Route is currently often used by travelers <br />when 1-90 traffic is congested. <br />• This route would require multiple bridge <br />structures over streams and creeks, <br />including one over the Yakima River. <br />• The new bridge structure over the Yakima <br />River would impact proposed restoration <br />work happening along the Yakima River at <br />Hanson Ponds. <br />• This would create a new southern <br />connection to the existing interchange at MP <br />85 to better serve access to South Cie Elum. <br />• Provides a more efficient emergency route <br />for the communities if a major failure <br />occurs on Interstate 90. <br />• Grading for a roadway would result in <br />major land transformation to the existing <br />area along the corridor. <br />• This route moves through areas of existing <br />rural residential developments and <br />communities. <br />• This volume of new roadway expansion in <br />undisturbed areas near streams is a very <br />high risk to culturally sensitive areas (fatal <br />flaw element). <br />• This alternative could provide economic <br />growth opportunities if land use zoning <br />changes were modified. <br />• Impacts to ESA listed fish and terrestrial <br />species as well as to aquatic resources. <br />• Potential impacts to historic and cultural <br />sites, as well as parks and recreational <br />facilities. <br />• Could impact wildlife connectivity. <br />Figure 2-11 Alternative 5 — Conceptual Cross -Section <br />VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor - Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 23 <br />