Laserfiche WebLink
an overview of the evaluation <br />process and scoring. A survey <br />was posted on the STEER <br />1-90 website for participants <br />to complete, focused on <br />ranking their three preferred <br />alternatives. Figure 5-4 <br />presents the participants' <br />choices for a preferred <br />alternative. Detailed polling <br />results can be found in <br />Appendix K. <br />5.4.5 Open House <br />An in -person open house <br />was held at the Cie Elum <br />Senior Center on February <br />28, 2024 to solicit feedback <br />on alternatives and their <br />evaluation. Approximately 100 <br />residents attended the open <br />house. Information boards <br />were displayed and staff from <br />the County, WSDOT, and the <br />project team were available <br />to answer questions. <br />Following initial viewing, a <br />question and answer period <br />took place. <br />CHAPTER 5: COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT <br />Figure 5-4 Webinar 2, February 2024 — Sample Polling Question <br />The seven alternatives were presented, as well <br />as an overview of the evaluation process and <br />scoring. A survey was available for attendees <br />to complete, focused on ranking their three <br />preferred alternatives. The public voted on one <br />or more preferred alternatives. Alternative 2 <br />received the most votes with Alternative 3 and <br />1 almost tied (see Figure 5-3 under the public <br />survey summary in Section 5.4.3). The public <br />heavily favored improvements that encroached <br />upon the median over outside widening or <br />outside of the 1-90 corridor. <br />Community Feedback <br />During discussions with open house attendees, <br />considerable attention was drawn not only to <br />the public's preferred alternative(s), but also to <br />existing alignment concerns that participants <br />hope will be addressed within the scope of <br />this project. A few attendees raised concerns <br />regarding potential snow storage locations in <br />Alternative 3. However, notable support was <br />voiced for Alternative 3 due to its potential to <br />mitigate disruption caused by lane closures in <br />either the westbound or eastbound direction. <br />VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor - Easton to Cie Elunn Feasibility Study 180 <br />