Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE STUDY AREA <br /> 4A crosses the CMZ and 100-year floodplain alternative are listed in Table 3-7.Additionally, <br /> of the Cie Elum River near the south end of sensitive areas such as breeding buffers occur <br /> Cle Elum Lake. Alternative 4A crosses the Cie for northern spotted owl within the study <br /> Elum River 100-year floodplain near its eastern areas for Alternatives 1 through 4a. <br /> terminus. Alternative 5 is within the Yakima <br /> River floodplain and CMZ near Cie Elum. Critical Habitat <br /> Alternatives 1 through 3 cross the Yakima River, <br /> 3.4.4 Environmental Species which is critical habitat for steelhead and bull <br /> Act (ESA) Listed Species and trout(Appendix B, Map 4A).Alternative 4A <br /> Critical Habitat passes through northern spotted owl critical <br /> The endangered and threatened species and habitat and terminates near the Cie Elum <br /> critical habitats criteria assess the alternatives River (Appendix B, Map 4C). Alternative 4B also <br /> for impacts to ESA listed species and critical passes through northern spotted owl critical <br /> habitats that may be impacted by the habitat and terminates near the Cie Elum River <br /> proposed alternatives. The potential presence <br /> (Appendix B, Map 4C). Alternative 5 adds new <br /> of ESA listed species and designated critical crossings over the Yakima River but does not <br /> habitat adjacent to each alternative is shown in pass through northern spotted owl critical <br /> Table 3-7. habitat. <br /> All alternatives,with the exception of 3.4.5 Historical Sites, Parks, <br /> Alternative 6 (no build alternative), may and Recreational Facilities <br /> affect bull trout and steelhead because there <br /> would likely be in-water work associated with Figure 3-3 provides the general location <br /> for historical sites, as well as parks and <br /> construction in rivers and streams that support <br /> recreational facilities.These resources are <br /> these species.Alternatives 4a and 5 would <br /> Listed below. In addition to the following <br /> likely have the greatest potential for long term <br /> resources, a more in-depth analysis was <br /> impacts to bull trout and steelhead because <br /> these alternatives require new bridge crossings performed which explores the geologic, <br /> historic, cultural, and ethnographic setting <br /> over the Cie Elum River and Yakima River, <br /> respectively.Alternatives 1 through 3 provide in the study area.This report is included in <br /> Appendix C. <br /> the greatest potential for improving water <br /> crossings which could have long term beneficial Cultural Sites <br /> effects for these species. <br /> A preliminary review of the Department of <br /> Construction noise may affect terrestrial Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP) <br /> species associated with these Alternatives; resources database revealed at least 60 <br /> however,this cannot be analyzed until an previously recorded archaeological resources <br /> action area is defined and field surveys occur within 0.5 miles of the 15.5-mile segment <br /> to assess potential habitat for ESA listed of 1-90. in addition, the DAHP's statewide <br /> species during future assessments. predictive model indicates that the majority of <br /> the highway segment under study lies within <br /> Species an area with a very high risk of containing <br /> Species that are potentially present within or archaeological features and/or materials. <br /> adjacent to the proposed alignment of each <br /> VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 45 <br />