My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024-04-08-minutes-cds-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2024
>
04. April
>
2024-04-16 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2024-04-08-minutes-cds-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2024 1:09:27 PM
Creation date
4/11/2024 1:08:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
4/16/2024
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
116716
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KITTITAS COUNTY <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES — BOARD OF COUNTY <br />COMMISSIONERS <br />2024 STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />STUDY SESSION DATE: April 8, 2024 <br />TOPIC: Title 17 Code Amendment <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize CDS staff to proceed with code amendment out of <br />docket cycle. <br />LEAD STAFF: Jamey Ayling, Planning Manager <br />RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff to pursue a code amendment of Title 17 separating animal <br />slaughter and meat preparation from agricultural processing definition and adding new section to <br />17.15 allowed uses. <br />BRIEFING SUMMARY: Working on the siting of multiple agricultural processing facilities and <br />seeing the controversy associated with the location of certain uses has suggested that staff should <br />utilize the Planning Commission to pursue a code amendment to separate animal slaughter and <br />meat preparation from the agricultural processing definition and consider appropriate zones these <br />specific uses should be permitted or allowed by conditional use. <br />BACKGROUND: Commissioner Wachsmith met with planning staff and requested this topic be <br />presented to the board for consideration at a study session. The intended outcome of the study <br />session is to determine if this should be forwarded on to staff to conduct research and analysis <br />for a code amendment out of docket cycle. Meat processing facility inquiries and applications <br />have increased recently, some more controversial than others leading Commissioner to consider <br />necessity of revising the siting criteria in an attempt to eliminate some of the controversial land <br />use applications in the future. <br />DISCUSSION: Planning Manager Ayling met with Commissioner Wachsmith and discussed the <br />pros and cons of removing agricultural processing as a conditional use from the allowed use <br />table completely. It was suggested to separate the animal slaughter and meat processing from <br />agricultural processing and bring that forward to the rest of the commission to determine if this <br />should be considered. <br />FISCAL IMPACTS: No fiscal impacts are anticipated. <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />Community Development Services "Study Session Staff Report", 2024 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.