Laserfiche WebLink
]Appendix 8 <br />Methodology <br />We obtained the evidence used to support the findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this audit <br />report during our fieldwork period (January to September 2023), with some additional follow-up work <br />afterward. To address the audit objectives, we used a variety of qualitative and quantitative approaches, <br />which are summarized below. <br />Reviewed laws and identified leading practices <br />We reviewed state law related to the "120-day rule" for permit approval time to identify requirements <br />for local government permit processes (RCW 36.70A and RCW 36.70B). We also reviewed the state <br />building code, as defined in Washington laws and regulations, which adopts the International Building <br />Code (RCW 19.27.031 and WAC 51-50-003). The International Building Code includes certain types <br />of permits, such as for grading and utilities, which we distinguished as civil" permits in our audit <br />report. We conducted online research to identify relevant leading practices. The Office for Regulatory <br />Innovation and Assistance (ORIA) published the guide "Local Government Permitting: Best Practices," <br />which addressed permit processes. The full report, published in 2008, is available on the ORIA <br />website. In determining implementation status for governments, we assessed factors such as whether <br />governments used the practice for all three permit types and whether the governments used the practice <br />for the audit period. <br />Interviewed local government staff and reviewed supporting <br />documentation <br />We conducted interviews with staff at each audited governmenfs relevant department(s) to gain an <br />understanding of their permitting processes. We also requested and reviewed policies, procedures, local <br />ordinances and regulations when applicable, and other relevant documentation to assess permitting <br />processes and compare them to legal requirements and leading practices, and to verify information <br />from our interviews. <br />Evaluated permit data <br />We requested permit data from the six audited governments, covering all permit applications submitted <br />during calendar years 2019 through 2022, to determine timeliness of government review and final <br />decisions. <br />Data reliability testing <br />For each audited government, we met with relevant staff to gain an understanding of the government's <br />permitting systems. We also wanted to determine whether they could provide sufficient and <br />appropriate data for us to evaluate how long it took to fully process permit applications. We gained an <br />understanding of the quality controls each government had in place to ensure permit data was accurate <br />and complete. However, we did not evaluate governments' system controls for their permitting systems. <br />Growth Management Act Appendix B 51 <br />