Laserfiche WebLink
F— <br />Audit Resufts <br />Of those that did report, few included all required information <br />We examined 18 published government reports on permit processing time, <br />and found 10 - including two audited governments, Shoreline and Vancouver <br />- included at least some of the elements required by law. Three of these reports <br />included only one permit type (such as including only land use permits but <br />not building or civil permits), even though they included most or all required <br />statistics. Reports published by four more governments contained most required <br />elements; however, only one of them included the number of applications <br />where deadline extensions were used. Finally, Exhibit 11 - Most permit performance reports <br />four surveyed governments said they published lacked some or all required information <br />performance reports, but what they provided did <br />not meet any of the requirements in state law. Reported most -"� required data <br />Reported at <br />a <br />One of these governments provided a link to its required data <br />report, but we were unable to find the report from ��- <br />the government's main website. This indicated <br />it was not publicly accessible, and we therefore <br />classified it as not meeting the legal requirements. <br />See Exhibit 11 for a breakdown of performance 1 n <br />reporting results. V <br />Reported some <br />Overall, the three required elements least likely required data <br />to be included were the number of permits with <br />deadline extensions, the number of permits that <br />met review deadlines and the number that did not. source: auditorana�ysis of government report data. <br />Revisions to state law will change. Lre pp a. Ling <br />requirements starting in 2025 <br />Governments that are required to post permit performance reports will soon be <br />required to adjust the content of their reports. These changes narrow the types of <br />permits that must be included in the reports. Some formerly reported data will <br />be eliminated, including the number of permits that did and did not meet review <br />deadlines and the number of permits where deadline extensions were used. New <br />required data will include the number of decisions issued for certain types of <br />permits and the average number of days from submittal to final decision. <br />The Department of Commerce will play a new role in coordinating the reports <br />from local governments and publishing the information statewide. Commerce will <br />be required to develop a report template for all reporting governments to use. This <br />change offers the agency an opportunity to educate local governments about their <br />reporting responsibilities. Doing so could help improve reporting by governments <br />that were unaware of reporting requirements or that believed it did not apply to <br />them. (See Appendix C for a summary of the changes made under the revised law.) <br />Growth Management Act Audit Results 34 <br />