My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-8-2024_PW SS Briefings (3)
>
Meetings
>
2024
>
04. April
>
2024-04-08 1:30 PM - Public Works Study Session
>
4-8-2024_PW SS Briefings (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:30:55 AM
Creation date
4/4/2024 3:55:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
4/8/2024
Meeting title
Public Works Study Session
Location
BoCC Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The revised chapter of state law sets three different deadlines depending on whether <br /> a permit requires public notice or hearing,and specifies what actions are accounted <br /> for in those deadlines.The new deadlines will be: <br /> 1. 65 days for permits that do not require public notice <br /> 2. 100 days for permits that require public notice but not a public hearing <br /> 3. 170 days for permits that require a public hearing <br /> The revised law also clarifies that these deadlines do not apply to time when <br /> applicants are making corrections or providing additional information,and that <br /> the days counted are calendar days.In addition,governments that fail to meet a <br /> specified deadline for a permit application will have to refund a portion of the <br /> applicant's fees.Appendix C summarizes the changes made under the revised law. <br /> This audit assessed whether selected ioc.at <br /> governments met the 1 20-day permit review <br /> timeline under state law <br /> Across Washington,246 local governments-28 counties and 218 cities-are <br /> required to meet the 120-day deadline for permits.Rather than attempting a broad <br /> look at all these jurisdictions,we selected six governments to review in detail. <br /> Our goal when selecting governments was to include a good mix of cities and <br /> counties on both sides of the Cascades.We chose high-growth areas with a variety <br /> of population sizes and considered urban and rural designations for counties and <br /> population density for cities. <br /> Because the provisions of the revised law are not yet in effect,this audit compared <br /> the performance of the local governments to the law in force during the 2019-2022 <br /> audit period. (Appendix B describes our review of current state law and building <br /> codes.)Despite changes in the law,we decided that it was still important to see how <br /> governments performed against the 120-day benchmark,and to determine why <br /> some permits were not processed within the deadline.We also wanted to examine <br /> whether audited governments waived the 120-day deadline entirely.The issues that Local governments <br /> cause governments to miss the current deadline,if not addressed,may also cause included in this audit <br /> governments to miss the new deadline. City of Bellingham <br /> This audit was designed to answer the following questions: City of Richland <br /> • To what extent are local governments complying with the 120-day rule, City of Shoreline <br /> including the annual reporting requirement? - City of Vancouver <br /> • Are local governments using processes appropriately for project permit Kittitas County <br /> reviews that exceed 120 days? Snohomish County <br /> Growth Management Act Background 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.