Laserfiche WebLink
County and the appellant, either personally or by mailing a copy of the order to the parties at his/her last known address as determined by the designated authorized official. b. The Hearing Examiner, in affirming the authorized official's Notice of Violation and Abatement, shall impose the fine consistent with the penalty provision of this Title and may assess administrative costs and/or costs related to the abatement of the nuisance. <br />c. The Hearing Examiner may order the County to pay the appellant costs, and/or attorney fees only upon a finding that both the violation did not occur and intentional misconduct on the part of the authorized official. d. The appellant may file a request for reconsideration of the Hearing Examiner's decision within ten (10) days of service of the Hearing <br />Examiner's written decision, based on any of the following grounds materially affecting the substantial rights of said party or person: i. Errors of procedure or misinterpretation of fact, material to the party seeking the request for reconsideration; ii. Irregularity in the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner by which such party was prevented from having a fair hearing; or iii. Clerical mistakes in the official file or record transmitted to the Examiner, including errors arising from inadvertence, oversight, or omission, which may have materially affected the Hearing Examiner’s decision on the matter. e. Upon receipt of a request for reconsideration, the Hearing Examiner shall <br />review said request in light of the record and take such further action as is deemed proper; including, but not limited to, denying the request, granting the request, with or without oral argument, and may render a revised decision. The decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be subject to reconsideration only one time, even if the Hearing Examiner reverses or <br />modifies the original decision. f. If no written request for reconsideration has been received by the authorized official within ten (10) days of the service of the order of the Hearing Examiner, the order shall be considered final unless appealed to the Kittitas County Superior Court. All such appeals shall be governed by <br />the Land Use Petition Act (Chapter 36.70c RCW). g. Any order related to a violation of the Shoreline Master Program shall be considered final unless appealed to the Shoreline Hearings Board. 7. Cooperative Abatement Agreements. The authorized official and the landowner may enter into a cooperative abatement <br />agreement which includes a right of entry agreement and an agreement regarding the recovery of costs of the abatement. 8. Cost Recovery. a. In addition to the other remedies available under this chapter, an authorized official may charge the costs of abatement to the landowner(s) who received the Notice of Violation and Abatement or to the landowner(s) <br />who were found personally liable for the costs of abating the nuisance by an order issued by the Hearing Examiner if an appeal was filed. The costs