My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1-8-2023 SSBriefings
>
Meetings
>
2024
>
01. January
>
2024-01-08 1:30 PM - Public Works Study Session
>
1-8-2023 SSBriefings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2024 2:42:19 PM
Creation date
1/4/2024 11:26:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
1/8/2024
Meeting title
Public Works Study Session
Location
BoCC Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Candie Leader <br /> From: Tracy Rooney <tracyr@msn.com> <br /> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:39 AM <br /> To: Laura Osiadacz; Cory Wright; Brett Wachsmith <br /> Cc: Mark Cook;Josh Fredrickson; Tracy Rooney;Julie Rooney; Eric Barlow <br /> Subject: Lick Creek (was Fw: Rooney Comments on PW Study Session draft (was Fw: June 28) <br /> Attachments: 2021_SS_Lick Creek private bridges_06172021.doc <br /> CAUTION:This email originated from outside the Kittitas County network. Do not click links, open attachments, <br /> fulfill requests, or follow guidance unless you recognize the sender and have verified the content is safe. <br /> Hello County Commissioners, <br /> I'm writing in regard to the Lick Creek project. I had a teleconference with Mr. Cook yesterday. This project <br /> got underway more than two years ago and understandably costs have increased considerably. I agreed with <br /> Mr. Cook that I would increase my spend to 57k from my original agreed upon 40k. <br /> As of last week, he informed me that I need to spend an additional 14K+taxes to purchase an "optional" <br /> abutment package. Paying for the abutment was not part of the discussion two years ago. I addressed this in <br /> the e-mail below which he may or may not have shared with you. <br /> With good faith in the process, I'm looking for a way forward. <br /> Below is the e-mail I sent nearly two years ago. It clearly stated my willingness to spend 40K on the project <br /> and the rationale behind that spend. I've been under the impression for the last two years that you <br /> authorized this proposal as PW proceeded to dig test pits, engaged a design firm, etc. Unfortunately the <br /> county delayed the project and costs increased. <br /> I understand Mr. Cook's desire to use a "SuperSill" as part of the abutment design. Basically, it's a <br /> prefabricated steel form which is filled with cement and becomes part of the abutment itself but is not <br /> required as part of the bridge itself. I confirmed with the TruNorth bridge sales representative that while it <br /> speeds installation time, there are other common abutment designs used for these bridges. <br /> I've attached a link to the optional SuperSill abutment package brochure as well as the separate brochure that <br /> details bridge specifics. <br /> I cannot justify this additional 14k+ expense above and beyond the increased amount for the bridge itself just <br /> to save the county money on the agreed installation process. <br /> I'm hoping that you'll consider my concerns and authorize Mr. Cook to work within the parameters of the <br /> $57K I agreed to spend. <br /> I'm looking forward to hearing from you. <br /> t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.