Laserfiche WebLink
iii. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or <br />welfare on or off the development proposal site; <br />iv. The proposal attempts to protect and mitigate impacts to the critical area functions <br />and values consistent with the best available science; and <br />v. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. <br />Pursuant to county code, a Director administrative decision may be appealed to the <br />Hearings Examiner and then to Superior Court (KCC 15A.03). <br />FISCAL IMPACTS: <br />Site engineering and building design are nearing completion. The county has invested <br />approximately $500,000 to date in land acquisition and building design costs. <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />EXHIBIT 1: KCC 17A.01.060 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2023 <br />