Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment D-'I <br />20SHSP Investment Justification <br />Washington is comprised of 39 counties with geography including forests, mountains, islands, rainforests, rivers, lakes, and <br />plains. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis ranked Washington 9 of 50 states for gross domestic product in 2019; several <br />world -class organizations headquarter their operations within the state. Washington has marine, aviation, rail, and road <br />transportation infrastructure to support its position as a bustling trade center. Approximately half of Washington's 7.5 <br />million population lives in the Seattle metropolitan area located along the Puget Sound. This area is the center of <br />transportation, business, and industry and is the fastest growing region in the state. Over three -fourths of the state's <br />population lives in densely settled urbanized areas. Understanding Washington's population is critical in order to mitigate <br />vulnerabilities, respond to incidents, and effectively concentrate recovery efforts. Washington is subject to ten natural <br />hazards and seven human -caused hazards. The THIRA focuses on eight of those risks: earthquake, tsunami, flood, biological <br />[communicable disease], wildfire, radiological, cyber incident, and terrorism. Planning, training, and exercise efforts are <br />being restructured to encompass the entire spectrum of catastrophic incidents within this context. Washington saw few <br />significant changes in the 2019 Capabilities Assessment. The lowest rated capabilities were Situational Assessment, Mass <br />Care Services, Economic Recovery, Health and Social Services, and Housing all essential during a catastrophic incident. The <br />strongest capabilities are Pubic Information and Warning and the area with the most growth potential is Situational <br />Assessment. The 2019 SPR results reinforced the findings from prior years: Stakeholders at every level struggle to sustain <br />emergency response capabilities with dwindling resources and are significantly challenged preparing for catastrophic <br />disasters. Since the early 2000s, cumulative emergency management funding at the state and local levels has reduced <br />significantly causing an increased dependence on federal grants to meet necessary emergency management requirements. <br />As a result, many areas are in a sustainment mode when it comes to emergency management capability and capacity. <br />Regional Risks - Reasons for the Work <br />Terrorist targets Include: <br />• Energy producing dams <br />• Large crowds during events <br />• Access control to critical infrastructure <br />DHS-FEMA-HSGP-SHSP-FFY20 Page 35 of 40 Kittltas County of. E24-059 <br />