Laserfiche WebLink
2.lM.arket Definition <br />Unlike radial and drive time studies that use arbitrarily chosen boundaries for customer trade <br />zones, the market definition exercise for Ellensburg is based on zip code surveys completed by <br />cooperating merchants. Zip code surveys have their own limitations, since zip code geographies <br />can be fairly large and stretch beyond typical market boundaries. However, it is the only <br />technique that comelates clearly with customer traffic collected by merchants. Recorded zip <br />codes are used to define a primary trade arca, which is then analyzed in terms of demographics <br />and economrc activity. <br />Two zip code surveys were conducted in Ellensburg in order to understand the market dSmamics <br />of the community while Central Washington University was in and out of session. The first <br />sulvey rvas held in July of 2015, and the second held in October of 2015. Sixteen local <br />community retail businesses gtaciously participated in the zip code suley of their customers in <br />July, and seventeen participated in October. Merchants were provided with a form to record <br />customer zip codes and asked to keep the log for all customers during aten-day period. <br />2.1.1 Zip Code Results <br />The results of the zip code survey are presented in Figures 1 .1 and 1.2 on the following page and <br />are summarized as follows: <br />. In July, Ellensburg businesses recorded 1,086 individual customer visits from 156 unique zip <br />codes representing 28 states and 12 foreign countries. ln October, they recorded 1,808 <br />individual visits from 178 unique zip codes representing 21 states and 3 foreign countries. <br />o During both surveys, the 95926 zip code for Ellensburg had the most customer visits, <br />controlling 56Yo of the visits in July and 51% of the visits in October. <br />o Customers were asked to identify whether they lived inside or outside the City of Ellensburg. <br />The two results were similar wrth 42Yo of the customers living inside the city limits in the <br />' < tA/ 1' I / 'l /! l) ll,-;r, :-- T--l-, --,-,-,-,^-lJuly survey &I7o JY"/o ln uclooer; llKewlse, IatTo uvgc oulsloc tlru ulty utlllts lll Jttly uuurPartru <br />with12% in October. <br />o Central Washington University students were asked to identi$ themselves in the survey and <br />represented the second highest percentage of visitors to shops and restaurants in the <br />downtown. As would be expected, their results varied between the two surveys with 7% of <br />the visits in July and20% of the visits in October. <br />r Visitors from the neighboring zip codes Kittitas and Cle Elum held 2Yo and 4o/o of their <br />respective visits in July and 4Yo and 5% of their respective visits in October. <br />r Customers from the rest of Washington accounted for 8o/o and 60/o of thet respective visits in <br />July and October. Many of these customers were regional in nature, so only a portion of <br />these might be considered "visitors" in the traditional sense that they do not rely on <br />Ellensburg as a regular destination for shopping. <br />o Visitors from outside the state of Washington accounted for L2o/o and 4% of the overall <br />respective visits from July and October. These numbers are quite significant when taken into <br />the context of the visits from the rest of Washington. Visitors represent a key portion of the <br />6