Laserfiche WebLink
The traffic counts shall reflect representative traffic conditions within transportation <br />corridors and at intersections. <br />G. The Public Works director reserves the right to require a developer to provide data <br />and/or analysis as part of a particular TIA, where the Public Works director determines <br />that additional information or analysis is required to implement the standards and <br />requirements contained in this section. <br />H. The concurrency evaluation and determination shall be completed prior to: <br />a. Issuance of administrative approval/denial of the project permit if SEPA <br />review is not a requirement of the project; or <br />b. Issuance of the DNS, MDNS or DS if SEPA review is a requirement of the <br />project; or <br />c. Issuance of the staff report to the hearings examiner if there is a hearing <br />before the hearings examiner and SEPA review is not a requirement of the <br />project. <br />I. Development permits for phased developments shall have the concurrency evaluation <br />completed for the entire project. A developer may elect to have the concurrency <br />evaluation undertaken for less than the entire project if and only if: <br />a. The director agrees to such limited evaluation; and <br />b. Each phase shall include all of the infrastructure to service that phase; and <br />c. There is a written note included in the preliminary approval for such phased <br />development that the traffic concurrency evaluation is limited only to the <br />specific phases for which approval has been provided. <br />J. Upon the written request of a developer, the Public Works director may waive the <br />requirement for a TIA where potential transportation impacts upon the affected <br />transportation corridor(s) and/or intersections have been adequately analyzed in prior <br />research or reports and/or are not projected to cause a reduction in the operating level <br />of affected transportation corridors and/or, intersections. Developers must provide <br />justification for their request to include, but not be limited to, the number of trips that <br />will be generated by the development, where these trips will access transportation <br />facilities, and the distribution of the trips when entering onto transportation facilities at <br />multiple access points. <br />K. The County may undertake an independent TIA to confirm or revise the results of the <br />developer's TIA. <br />L. The County may reserve capacity on its transportation facilities for future developments <br />considered high priority by the County. (Ord. 2011-011, 2011) <br />(Ord. 2015-010. 2015) <br />12.10.050 Concurrency Determination. <br />The county shall not approve a development permit unless there are adequate transportation <br />facilities to meet the level of service standards for existing and approved uses, based on the forecast <br />peak hour traffic volumes and the committed transportation system. Concurrency requires adequate <br />transportation facilities to be in place at the time of development or that a financial commitment is in <br />place to complete the improvements or strategies needed for adequate transportation facilities <br />within six years. <br />A. If the concurrency evaluation shows that the ratio of the forecast peak hour traffic <br />volume to the capacity of each transportation facility is equal to or less than the <br />