Laserfiche WebLink
DISCUSSION: <br />PW has spent the past couple of months reviewing our regulatory requirements along <br />with any permit discretion we have in county code and state law. We have also evaluated <br />the water district serving Elk Meadows to understand operational issues associated with <br />McElroy Bridge use. Staff have also begun working to secure terrestrial access to the <br />water district's system reservoir located on the far shore of the Yakima River. <br />Consultation with the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) legal advisor (Kittitas <br />County Prosecuting Attorney's Office) has produced a resolution imposing a temporary <br />land use moratorium on far shore properties (EXHIBIT 3). <br />PW proposes notifying the EMHOA of our determination of non-compliant status of <br />McElroy Bridge. The currently imposed deadline of November 15, 2023, is not a <br />workable timeline for the EMHOA to develop a course of action. It is essential, however, <br />that staff define a project timeline that is reasonable for resolving the fate of the existing <br />McElroy Bridge. Staff proposes engaging the community on potential solution timelines <br />in concert with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Washington State <br />Department of Ecology and the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. <br />It will likely take a couple of months for EMHOA to obtain an opinion on the probable <br />technical solution to making the McElroy Bridge compliant. The FCZD, PW and other <br />federal and state agencies will likely allow a performance period on the part of EMHOA <br />(say four months). A detailed plan for compliance will then define project actions and <br />associated timelines. Permitting actions and associated timelines will also require <br />definition. Failure in meeting compliance plan implementation actions and timelines will <br />result in code enforcement actions up to and including closing the bridge to use and/or <br />bridge removal. Staff believes anything short of this outcome, will not be favorably met <br />by state and federal regulatory agencies. <br />The community is not a rich one. PW presumes the EMHOA has limited financial <br />resources. Navigating state and federal permitting requirements requires skills best <br />acquired by practice. PW is well skilled in securing the wide range of permits supporting <br />bridge replacements. Consideration should be given, by the BoCC, affording EMHOA <br />access to PW permitting expertise with assistance from state and federal agencies. The <br />BoCC may also desire technical expertise from PW assisting in the development of the <br />required compliance plan of action. While current PW resources are limited, the <br />likelihood of success on the part of the EMHOA is low, given the need to demonstrate <br />significant resolve to state and federal regulatory agencies on a compressed timeline. The <br />BoCC, in directing support of compliance plan creation, must acknowledge that resources <br />spent in the effort may ultimately fall short of avoiding bridge closure or removal. <br />FISCAL IMPACTS: <br />Undetermined at this time. <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />EXHIBIT 1: FCZD FLOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT <br />EXHIBIT 2: PW PRIVATE BRIDGE STANDARDS REGULATORY EVALUATION <br />EXHIBIT 3: PROPOSED LAND USE TEMPORARY MORATORIUM <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2023 <br />