Laserfiche WebLink
airport consultant JUB stated that the 30 day model is also what they are aware of as <br />standard practice. <br /> <br />The 1 year T Hangar lease model requires that all 12 leases must be renewed, resigned <br />and approved every year according to Resolution 2022-043. Rescinding this Resolution <br />and reverting to 30-day leases will reduce administrative work. Once a 30 day lease is <br />signed by the tenant and the airport, it is basically open ended as long as they stay in <br />good standing with the County. The lease will state that each side can vacate or terminate <br />by giving 30 days’ notice. This style lease will eliminate the need to draft and approve 12 <br />new T Hangar leases every year. <br /> <br />The current approved T Hangar lease also has a couple of provisions that are also not <br />standard practice by other airports. The first is a Least Transfer/Assignment Fee of <br />$525.00. Through my research, this is not practiced at other airports and is very <br />unpopular. An administrative fee of $100 would probably be more appropriate to equal <br />the time of the airport staff to work the lease transfers. Second, there is a 10% fee to <br />tenants who pay monthly. This was to offset administrative costs but is again not a <br />practice at other airports. I would recommend eliminating this as monthly payments do <br />not cause the airport any undue administrative work. Under the old version of 30-day <br />leases, this would be especially problematic. Tenants can pay annually or other lengths if <br />desired, with monthly payments being the minimum requirement. <br /> <br />I am working with the Prosecutor to draft a 30 day lease to bring before the BoCC for <br />discussion and approval. We are utilizing the previous lease as well as the example 30- <br />day lease sent to me by the Airport Director in Olympia. Once a draft is ready, I will <br />work with the BoCC for approval. The previous 1-year leases on the T Hangars expired <br />February 28th, 2023, so the sooner we secure new leases, the better for all parties <br />involved. <br /> <br />I have spoken with a few tenants I was able to get a hold of and they stated that they <br />would work within lease requirements either way. To be clear, the current Resolution is <br />not illegal, and if the BoCC would like it continued, it is not violating any laws. It is just <br />not inline with other airports within the state and does develop more administrative work <br />for airport staff. I would recommend rescinding Resolution 2022-043, and upon the <br />approval of the BoCC, revert to the 30-day leasing model. The 1-year model was <br />previously supported by the AAC, but after speaking with them again, they are in full <br />support of the 30-day model. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACTS: <br />The fiscal impacts are listed below for the above projects (all are approximate): <br /> <br />1) Each public hearing requires a notice to be placed in the newspaper. Eliminating the <br />need for extra public hearings concerning T Hangars will save the airport between $1200 <br />to $2000 annually. It will also save the airport staff time, which is a monetary value as <br />well. <br />