My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022 Docket Enabling Ordinance (2)
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
12. December
>
2022-12-20 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2022 Docket Enabling Ordinance (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2022 11:04:51 AM
Creation date
12/19/2022 11:03:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/20/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance Adopting the 2022 Annual Docket Amendments to Kittitas County Code and Comprehensive Plan
Notes
Amended vote for Docket Item 22-22, language for SEPA appeal hearing in Docket Item 22-25, and revised code language for Docket Item 22-1.
Order
14
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
97382
Type
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Wholesale trade, warehousing (including miniwarehouse <br />facilities), processing and manufacturing facilities, heavy <br />equipment repair, lumber yard, car sales, or similar land <br />consumptive but low traffic generation uses <br />1.0 per 1,500 square feet of gross <br />floor area for structures up to <br />20,000 square feet in gross size with <br />a minimum of 5 spaces required OR <br />1.0 per 2,000 square feet of gross <br />floor area for structures greater than <br />20,000 square feet in gross size. <br />NOTE: For vehicle sales lots, the <br />sales area is not considered to be a <br />parking facility and does not have to <br />comply with the requirements of <br />this chapter. However, all required <br />parking must be designed and <br />reserved for customer parking only. <br />PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC USES <br />Hospital 1.5 per each 5 beds with a minimum <br />of 5 spaces required <br />Elementary and junior high schools 1.0 per classroom, plus 1 per 50 <br />students <br />High schools, college or university, trade school, or business <br />school <br />1.0 per classroom, plus 1 per 10 <br />students <br />Governmental office 1.0 per 350 square feet of gross <br />floor area <br />17.11.039.1 Footnotes Associated with Table: <br />1. In those situations where a particular use is not specifically mentioned in this table, the <br />requirements for off-street parking shall be determined by the director and in accordance with the <br />most comparable use listed. <br />a. Shell Building Permit Applications. When the county has received a shell building permit <br />application, off-street parking requirements shall be based on the possible tenant <br />improvements or uses authorized by the zone designation and compatible with the <br />limitations of the shell permit. When the range of possible uses results in different parking <br />requirements, the director shall establish the amount of parking based on a likely range of <br />uses. For example, an applicant submits a permit for a 5,000-square-foot shell building in <br />the C-H zone. The zone allows for a range of retail, personal, and general service retail <br />uses. Most permitted uses in this zone fall in the category of general retail and service uses <br />in Table 17.11.039(4)(a)(i) which requires one space per 300 square feet of gross floor area. <br />Restaurants require more parking (one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area). While <br />the director might find it unreasonable to require parking for the "worst case scenario" in <br />terms of possible use types, he or she will typically choose a requirement that falls between <br />the possible use scenarios. In this case, the odds are that most possible uses fall in the <br />general retail and service use category with a lower parking requirement, though a slightly <br />higher parking requirement would make sense given the possibility of a use such as a <br />restaurant, which requires greater parking. Thus, a compromise standard, requiring a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.