My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-11-28-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
12. December
>
2022-12-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2022-11-28-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 2:12:58 PM
Creation date
12/1/2022 2:12:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/6/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
96854
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finding of No Significant Impact <br />As a result, Reclamation began investigating Kachess Dam to understand the extent of the safety <br />risk it presents under the Dam Safety Priority Rating (DSPR) system. This system provides a means <br />for Reclamation to establish the urgency of risk management activities and the relative priority of <br />these actions within the overall inventory of dams. Kachess Dam was previously designated as a <br />DSPR 3 facility (moderate to high priority). This category is reserved for annualized life loss risks or <br />failure probabilities estimated to be moderate to high with generally moderate to high confidence. <br />Based on Reclamation's recent investigations, the dam is now judged to be in the DSPR 2 category <br />(urgent priority). This category is used for situations where expedited action to reduce the risk of <br />failure may be appropriate. A timely transition into the final design process will help ensure a long- <br />term risk reduction without delay. <br />With this rating change, Reclamation has determined that, although the estimated risk is high, the <br />dam's overall condition is good for its age with no significant adverse performance to date; further, <br />the responsible office does a good job of monitoring the dam and responding to any concerns in a <br />timely manner. However, the risk of failure is comparatively high such that timely modification of <br />the dam is necessary. The primary reason is that, while the dam is currently stable, seepage in the <br />areas of concern is both quantifiable and predictable over the normal operating range. The <br />recommended interim risk reduction action is therefore focused on enhanced performance <br />monitoring. The need for additional interim risk reduction actions will be revisited if conditions <br />change prior to the completion of the dam safety modification. <br />Accordingly, to prevent eroded soils from exiting the dam, Reclamation is proposing this project to <br />filter and monitor the seepage. Reclamation's primary project goals are to limit internal erosion and <br />decrease the risk of dam failure with moderate certainty; its secondary project goal is to limit impacts <br />on fish and irrigation. <br />The purpose of and need for the proposed project include <br />1. Implementing cost-effective measures to reduce the risks, per Reclamation's Public <br />Protection Guidelines <br />2. Maintaining water deliveries to irrigation districts, tribes, and others throughout the Yakima <br />River basin <br />3. Minimizing impacts on the environment <br />4. Maintaining water flows for endangered species <br />As part of its SOD program mission, Reclamation is committed to ensuring its dams do not present <br />unacceptable risk levels to people, property, and the environment. These requirements result in a <br />need for Reclamation to implement corrective action to bring static and hydrologic risks at Kachess <br />Dam below public protection guidelines, while minimizing impacts on the environment. <br />Alternatives <br />This EA analyzed two alternatives: the No Action Alternative and the Proposed Action Alternative <br />(Proposed Action). <br />Kachess Safety of Dams Final Environmental Assessment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.