My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Addendum to LESO Program State Plan of Operation
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
11. November
>
2022-11-01 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Addendum to LESO Program State Plan of Operation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2022 11:50:44 AM
Creation date
11/29/2022 11:50:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
11/1/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Acknowledge the Addendum to the LESO Program State Plan of Operation (SPO) between the State of Washington and Kittitas County Sheriff’s Office
Order
12
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
95608
Type
Agreement
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ii) Constitutional Policing- LEA policies/procedures rnust emphasizethal all police work should <br />be carried out in alnanner consistent with the requirernents of the U.S. Constitution and federal <br />law. Policies/procedures must include Filst, Foufih, and Fourteenth Amendment principles in <br />law enforcernent activity, as well as compliance with Federal and State civil rights laws. LEA <br />certified law enforcement officers receive tLaining on the rights errbodied by such Constitutional <br />Amendments and how these amendments infonn policing policies/procedures. <br />iii) Carumunity Input and Intpact- LEA policies/procedures mLrst identify mechanisms that LEAs <br />will use to engage the coulnunities they serve to infonn them and seek their input about LEAs <br />actions, role in, and relationships with the community. LEAs should make parlicular efforts to <br />seek the input of communities where controlled property is likely to be used so as to mitigate the <br />cffect that such use may have on public confidence in the police. This could be achieved through <br />the LEAs regular interactions with the public througb community foruns, town halls, or meetings <br />with the Chief, or commrinity outreach divisions. <br />b) Adopt and comply with controlled property standards. <br />i) Appropriate Use of Controlled Property- LEA policies/procedures must define appropriate <br />use of controlled property; officers who are authorized to use controlled ploperry must be trained <br />on these policies/procedures. LEAs should examine scenarios in which controlled properfy will <br />likely be deployed, the decision-rnaking processes that will determine whether contlolled <br />property is used, and the potential that both use and misuse of controlled property could create <br />fear and distrust in the commLrnity. Policies/procedures should consider whether measures can <br />be taken to rnitigate thal effect (i.e., keep armored vehicles at a staging area until needed) and <br />any alternatives to the use of such property and tactics to minimize negative effects on the <br />cornrn unity, whil e preserving o ffi cer safety. <br />ii) Superviston of Use- LEA policies/procedures must specify appropriate supervision of <br />personnel operating or utilizing controlled property. Supervision must be tailored to the type of <br />controlled propertv being used and the nature of the engagement or operation during which the <br />property will be used. Policieslprocedures must describe when a supervisor of appropriate <br />authority is required to be present and actively overseeing the propefty being used- <br />iii) Effectiveness Evaluation- LEA policies/procedures must articulate that the LEA will <br />reguiarly monitor and evaluate the effectiveness arrd value of controlled property to detelmine <br />whether continued deployment and use is warranted on operational, tactical, and technical <br />grounds. LEAs should routinely review after-action reports and analyze any data on, for <br />example, how often controlled property is used or wlrether eontrolled property is used more <br />frequently in certain law enforcement operations or in particular locations or neighborhoods. <br />iv) Auditing and Accountability- LEA must establish policies/procedures that are designed to <br />prevent misuse, unauthorized use and/or loss of controlled properfy. LEA will hold personnel <br />accountable to agree and comply witl'r State, local, Tlibal and Federai controlled property use <br />policies/procedures. <br />v) Transparency and Notice- LEA policies/procedures must articulate that LEA will engage the <br />community regarding controlled property, policies/procedures governing its use, and review of <br />"significant incidents" (as defined in Section 8), with the understanding that there ars reasonable <br />lirnitations on disclosures of certain information and law enforcement sensitive operations and <br />procedures. <br />Page 6 of9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.