Laserfiche WebLink
Forest Health Treatment Needs (continued) <br />Dry dense forest treatment need <br />Currently, dense, multistory forest structure is over-repre- <br />sented on dry sites, especially sites dominated by Douglas- <br />fir. Treating 5,500-7,500 acres of dense dry forest (Table 1) <br />is recommended to shift the landscape from dense to open <br />forest. ln locations with large trees, removing smaller trees <br />and treating fuels with mechanical or fire-based methods <br />will create more fire-, insect-, and drought-resistant forest <br />structure. Favoring ponderosa pine and reducing Douglas- <br />fir and grand fir on drier sites is also recommended. <br />Definitions <br />Vegetation Types <br />Cold forest: Upper elevation mixed-conifer forests with high-se- <br />verityfires every 80-200+ years. <br />Dry forest: Ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir dominated forests that <br />historically had surface fires every 5-25 years. <br />Moist forest Forests that historically had mixed-severity fires <br />every 30-100 years and were composed of fire-resistant (western <br />larch, Douglas-fir) and fire-intolerant (grand fir) trees. <br />Woodland/Steppe: Grass and shrub lands that may have oak <br />woodlands or up to 10% cover of conifers. <br />Forest structute <br />Large tree: Overstory diameter > 20 inches; Medium tree: Over- <br />story diameter 10-20 inches; Small tree: Overstory diameter < 10 <br />inches; Dense canopy: Greater than 40o/o tree canopy; Open can- <br />opln Less than 40o/o tree canopy. <br />Fuels: Shrubs, grasses. small trees, litter, duff, and dead wood. <br />Fuels Treatmenfs.'some combination of mechanical density reduc- <br />tion (commercial or non-commercial) and surface and ladder fuel re- <br />duction (prescribed fire, piling & burning, etc.). <br />Manoged wildfire: fire is allowed to burn under safe conditions to <br />achieve management goals; can be suppressed if conditions change. <br />Current Post-treatment* <br />Dry <br />Forest <br />(18,565 ac) <br />Moist-cold <br />Forest <br />(17,430 ac) <br />I Smalt Open I Med,Large Open S Small Dense I Med-Large Dense <br />Left: Figure 6. Current and post-treatment proportions of forest types and structure classes. * mid-point of range in Table 1 <br />Right Figure 7. Sustainability of current and potential large tree, dense forest based on fire risk and drought vulnerability. <br />Moist and cold dense forest treatment need <br />Dense, multistory forest on moist and cold sites exceeds or <br />is at the upper end of desired ranges throughout the plan- <br />ning area, and patch sizes are too large. Treating 5,500- <br />9,250 acres of dense forest on moist and cold sites (Table <br />1, Fig.4) is recommended to reduce the risk of large crown <br />fire and help forests adapt to a warming climate. lncreasing <br />the relative composition of ponderosa pine and western <br />larch is also needed. Following treatments, approximately <br />half of the total moist and cold forest area would remain <br />dense (Fig. 6) to meet habitat, wood production, and other <br />objectives. <br />Open forest mointenonce treatment need <br />Over the next 15 years, an estimated 3,000-5,250 acres of <br />currently open forests on dry and moist sites will need pre- <br />scribed fire, managed wildfire, or mechanical methods to <br />maintain open conditions by reducing surface fuels and <br />small trees. Specific maintenance strategies depend on <br />landowner objectives and time since prior treatments. <br />Sustoinable locations for dense forest with lorge trees <br />Locations with low to moderate current and future mois- <br />ture deficits (Fig.3) and low fire risk (Fig. 2) offer the most <br />sustainable locations to maintain sufficient area and patch <br />sizes of this forest habitat type and associated ecosystem <br />functions. Sustainable locations include the eastern end of <br />the planning area, as well as north-facing slopes in the cen- <br />tral portion and valley bottom areas in the northeastern <br />corner (Fig.7). <br />Large dense forest <br />sustainability <br />HighIa <br />Low <br />Upper Swauk Landscape Evaluation Summary e020) | page 4