My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RES-2022-189
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
10. October
>
2022-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
RES-2022-189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2022 8:11:26 AM
Creation date
10/11/2022 8:08:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Amending the 2018 Community Wildfire Protection Plan and to authorize the Chairman's Signature on the Adoption Page with Amendment
Order
6
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
94348
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Overarching Goals <br />Reduce wildfire risk and protect communities <br />Fire risk is high to extreme in northern and western por- <br />tions of the planning area due to high fuel loads and burn <br />probability (Fig. 2). The western portion represents some <br />of the highest fire risk in eastern WA. Fuels treatments are <br />needed to break up the large patches of dense forest to <br />reduce the likelihood of large crown fire. Relatively lower <br />fire risk in the southeastern portion is due in part to recent <br />treatments on USFS and private land, as well as the 2012 <br />Table Mountain Fire. However, fire risk is still high to ex- <br />treme in some areas around Liberty and Highway 97,in- <br />cluding private parcels with homes. The planned Swauk <br />Pine treatments will reduce the risk of wildfire and insect <br />outbreaks. Additional treatments in dense forest in north- <br />ern and western portions will furlher mitigate these risks. <br />lnqease resilience and prepare for climote changp <br />Projected warming will increase moisture stress and risk <br />of wildfire and insect outbreaks, which are already gener- <br />ally high in currently dry and moist forest types. By mid- <br />century, 41o/o of the planning area is projected to have <br />moisture stress levels currently associated with woodland <br />and shrub-steppe, indicating that these locations may no <br />longer support forest (Fig. 3). Treatments to reduce den- <br />sity and favor drought-tolerant species on projected fu- <br />ture high and very high deficit sites will support forest <br />persistence into the future. <br />Sustain wildlife hobitat <br />Habitat for dry forest, large tree, open canopy species <br />(e.9. White Headed Woodpecker) is well represented in <br />central portions of the planning area, primarily in loca- <br />tions with recent thinning treatments. Habitat for species <br />that depend on moist, closed canopy forest with large <br />trees (e.9. Northern Spotted Owl) is in the middle or up- <br />per end of desired ranges, though it is overly abundant <br />in large patches in western portions. ln high fire risk lo- <br />cations, reducing tree density and canopy cover will re- <br />duce crown fire potential and drought vulnerability, help <br />maintain habitat in the most sustainable locations (Fig. <br />7), and broaden the spatial distribution of open canopy <br />habitat. When consistent with the Northwest Forest Plan, <br />lighter, variable density thinning in mid-sized stands can <br />accelerate habitat development. Habitat for cold forest, <br />large-tree, closed canopy species (e.g. American Marten) <br />is a relatively minor component of this planning area. <br />En ha n ce ru ra I eco n o mic d eve lopme nt <br />Reducing fire risk will help sustain recreation and tourism <br />while reducing the potential of smoke affecting nearby <br />communities. Warming trends may make it difficult to <br />sustain timber production on south-facing slopes in the <br />planning area (Fig. 3). ln the remainder, long-term timber <br />production will likely be possible if proactive strategies to <br />shift species composition and manage for lower tree den- <br />sity are adopted over time. <br />Current <br />1981-2010 <br />Future <br />2041-2070 <br />Moisture deficit <br />I Low <br />I Moderate <br />ffiS Hign <br />I Very high <br />Moisture deficit is <br />a measure of <br />water stress faced <br />by plants. <br />No--L",,",A <br />Figure 3. Current (left) and future (right) moisture stress levels based on water balance deficit. Low levels are associated with <br />moist and cold forest types, high with dry forest tyrpes, and very high with woodland or shrub-steppe. Future climate is <br />based on a business as usual greenhouse gas emissions scenario (RCp 8.5). <br />Upper Swauk Londscape Evaluation Summary (2020) | Poge 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.