My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RES-2022-189
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
10. October
>
2022-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
RES-2022-189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2022 8:11:26 AM
Creation date
10/11/2022 8:08:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Amending the 2018 Community Wildfire Protection Plan and to authorize the Chairman's Signature on the Adoption Page with Amendment
Order
6
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
94348
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Overarching Goals <br />Reduce wildfire risk and protect communities <br />Fire risk is high to extreme throughout the eastern, north- <br />ern, and southern portions of the planning area due to <br />high fuel loads and burn probability (Fig. 2). The eastern <br />portion represents some of the highest fire risk in eastern <br />WA. High risk areas on the southern edge are adjacent to <br />the Cle Elum planning area and include private property. <br />Fuels treatments are needed to break up the large patches <br />of dense forest to reduce the likelihood of large crown fire <br />and to facilitate protection of private property along <br />Highway 970 and Teanaway Road. ln much of the central <br />portion and within the 2017 Jolly Mountain Fire perimeter, <br />fire is predicted to have low risk or beneficial effects due <br />to reduced fuels and lower burn probability from exten- <br />sive harvesting and fire effects. <br />lncrease resilience and prepare for climate change <br />By mid-century, the majority of the planning area is pro- <br />jected to have moisture stress levels that are currently as- <br />sociated with dry forest (Fig. 3). Substantial area in the <br />southern end is projected to shift to non-forest over time. <br />Moderate and low moisture stress levels are projected to <br />remain on north-facing slopes and valley bottoms, pri- <br />marily in the northern half. Treatments, as well as man- <br />aged wildfires in roadless and other inaccessible areas, <br />that reduce density and favor drought-tolerant species <br />will support forest persistence into the future. <br />S u sta in wild life ha bitot <br />Habitat for dry forest, large tree, open canopy species (e.g. <br />White Headed Woodpecker) is well represented in the <br />planning area, although it is concentrated in large patches <br />in the east and south. Habitat for species that depend on <br />moist, closed canopy forest with large trees (e.g. Northern <br />Spotted Owl) is in the middle or upper end of desired <br />ranges, though it is overly abundant in eastern and central <br />portions. ln high fire risk locations, reducing tree density <br />and canopy cover will reduce crown fire potential and <br />drought vulnerability, help maintain habitat in the most <br />sustainable locations (Fig. 7), and broaden the spatial dis- <br />tribution of open canopy habitat. Habitat for cold forest, <br />large-tree, closed canopy species (e.g. American Mar.ten) <br />is well represented but concentrated in large patches <br />along the central part of the northern edge. <br />En ho nce ru ra I eco nom ic developme nt <br />Most of the higher priority areas for commercial treat- <br />ments have road access and will produce significant tim- <br />ber volume. Extensive harvesting by past owners in the <br />Teanaway Community Forest has reduced wood produc- <br />tion potential for the next 2-3 decades. Although warming <br />trends and high burn probability will necessitate manag- <br />ing for lower densities and fuel loads, long-term timber <br />production will likely be possible in much of the commu- <br />nity forest and adjacent USFS land. Reducing fire risk will <br />help sustain recreation and tourism while reducing the <br />potential of smoke affecting nearby communities. <br />Current <br />1981-2010 <br />Future <br />2041-2070 <br />Moisture deficit <br />I Low <br />I Moderate <br />I xtgtr <br />I Very high <br />Moisture deficit <br />is a measure of <br />water stress <br />faced by plants. <br />No-i-jr*. A <br />Figure 3. Current (left) and future (right) moisture stress levels based on water balance deficit. Low levels are associated with <br />moist and cold forest types, high with dry forest types, and very high with woodland or shrub-steppe. Future climate is <br />based on a business as usual greenhouse gas emissions scenario (RCp g.5). <br />Teanaway Landscope Evaluation Summaryr (2020) | poge 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.