Laserfiche WebLink
Manastash-Taneum Landscape Evaluation Summary Addendum (2020) | Page 3 <br />Figure 4. Landscape prioritization of dual benefits using PODs as a spatial framework to summarize treatment priorities. <br />Both maps display landscape treatment priority within PODs and wildfire response benefit within PCLs. The map on the left <br />shows the datasets at the raster level, while the map on the right shows the same information summarized and ranked within <br />PODs and PCLs. Gray within planning area denotes locations without substantial forest cover. PCL width is inflated to display <br />spatial patterns. PODs shown here are part of an ongoing process towards an all-lands delineation; POD boundaries are sub- <br />ject to change following on-the-ground vetting and continued dialogue among wildfire agencies and stakeholders. <br />LEARN MORE CONTACT <br />This landscape evaluation was updated in 2020. Amy Ramsey <br />More details about DNR’s priority planning areas are Forest Health Strategic Plan Coordinator <br />available on the 20-Year Forest Health Strategic Plan website: 360-902-1694 <br />https://www.dnr.wa.gov/ForestHealthPlan amy.ramsey@dnr.wa.gov <br />Prioritizing Landscape Treatments for Dual Benefits <br /> <br />Integration of forest health and wildfire response benefit using PODs <br /> <br />Potential Operational Delineations (PODs) provide a pow- <br />erful spatial framework to communicate and identify lo- <br />cations that will deliver dual benefits for forest health and <br />wildfire response at the landscape scale. PODs are large <br />landscape areas delimited by Potential Control Lines <br />(PCLs) for fire operations (suppression, prescribed fire, <br />and managed wildfire) delineated by fire operations per- <br />sonnel. PCLs can be roads, ridgelines, or any artificial or <br />natural fuelbreak that provides a strategic opportunity for <br />fire operations. Summarizing landscape treatment priori- <br />ties (Fig. 1) within PODs and wildfire response benefit pri- <br />orities (Fig. 3) within PCLs enables planners and managers <br />to identify, at a high level, locations where forest health or <br />fuels treatments can be connected to a high-priority PCL <br />that will support firefighter operations (e.g. ingress/egress <br />route or opportunity for engagement). <br />There is important work to do in all Manastash-Taneum <br />PODs. First priority PODs follow spatial patterns of forest <br />health treatment needs and occur predominantly in the <br />western part of the planning area (Fig. 4; Taneum Ridge). <br />PODs and PCLs in this planning area typically similar pri- <br />ority rankings. One notable exception is a first priority PCL <br />on the west side of the planning area adjacent to South <br />Cle Elum Ridge. Further work is needed to assess PCLs lo- <br />cally for their condition and detailed treatment needs, <br />which will depend on management goals and values at <br />risk. Ideally, landscape treatments will be implemented <br />adjacent to priority PCLs where feasible to maximize both <br />forest health and wildfire response goals. <br /> <br />Achieving dual benefits will require primarily large, land- <br />scape-level treatments across PODs (~100’s-1,000’s of <br />acres) and, to a lesser extent, targeted treatments along <br />PCLs. These two approaches combined will contribute to <br />restoring and maintaining large portions of the landscape <br />in a resilient condition while providing safe and effective <br />areas for firefighter engagement during suppression, pre- <br />scribed fire, or managed wildfire operations. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Achieving forest health and wildfire response goals <br />will require primarily large, landscape-level treat- <br />ments across PODs (~100’s-1,000’s of acres) and, <br />to a lesser extent, targeted treatments along PCLs.