My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
KittitasCountyCWPP_September2022_Amendment-combined
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
10. October
>
2022-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
KittitasCountyCWPP_September2022_Amendment-combined
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2022 1:04:27 PM
Creation date
9/29/2022 12:58:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Amending the 2018 Community Wildfire Protection Plan and to authorize the Chairman's Signature on the Adoption Page with Amendment
Order
6
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
94348
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Community Wildfire Protection Plan 7 September 2018 <br />Although reducing the risk of high intensity wildland fire is the primary motivation behind this plan, <br />managing the wildlands for hazardous fuels reduction and fire resilience is only one part of the larger <br />picture. Residents and visitors desire healthy, fire-resilient wildlands that provide habitat for wildlife, <br />recreational opportunities, economic stimulation, and scenic beauty. <br />In keeping with the strategy of the original Kittitas County CWPP, the Subcommittee revisited the <br />planning outline in Preparing a Community Wildfire Protection Plan: A Handbook for Wildland-Urban <br />Interface Communities (Communities Committee et al. 2004). That document provides an eight-step <br />process for updating a CWPP. Below are eight steps and the achievements of the Subcommittee in <br />taking each of the steps outlined. <br />• Step one: Convene the decision makers. <br />The Kittitas County CWPP Subcommittee reconvened in April 2018 to review the work <br />completed within and adjacent to the WUI boundary on public and private lands and to <br />reevaluate the priorities for future fuels reduction treatments. The Subcommittee is comprised <br />of the Program Director from Project Wildfire; Fire Marshals from local fire districts; <br />representatives from DNR; representatives from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM); <br />the Kittitas County Forester, other stakeholders, and members of the public. <br />• Step two: Involve state and federal agencies. <br />HFRA directed communities to collaborate with local and state government representatives, in <br />consultation with federal agencies and other interested parties in the development of a <br />CWPP. The Subcommittee recognized the importance of this collaboration and involved not <br />only members from the USFS, but DNR and Kittitas County representatives as well. Each <br />agency brought a wealth of information about fuels reduction efforts planned and completed, <br />along with educational information based on current research across the nation. <br />• Step three: Engage interested parties. <br />The Subcommittee included representatives from the Communities at Risk, members of local <br />businesses, road districts, homeowner/neighborhood associations, and other organizations <br />and individuals. The Subcommittee encouraged a collaborative environment for the <br />stakeholders to accomplish the 2017 revision of the Kittitas County CWPP. Collaboration and <br />coordination between agencies, community members, and landowners is the fundamental <br />goal of the Cohesive Strategy. <br />• Step four: Establish a community base map. <br />The Subcommittee reviewed the previous maps and boundaries from the 2009 CWPP. The <br />group approved the 2018 CWPP boundary, which now has nine rating areas that replaced the <br />previous eight. The Subcommittee was able, with this change to the base map, to accurately <br />assess the risk in two areas, which were in one rating area in the previous plan, each with two <br />distinctly different vegetation types.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.