My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Allocation Agreement with exhibits - final
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
09. September
>
2022-09-06 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Allocation Agreement with exhibits - final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2022 1:11:41 PM
Creation date
9/1/2022 1:10:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
9/6/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Chair's Signature on a Opioid Litigation Allocation Agreement
Order
3
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
93293
Type
Agreement
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />4 <br />executed the MOU only for purposes of the Allocation Agreement <br />Governing the Allocation of Funds Paid by the Settling Opioid <br />Distributors in Washington State. <br />B. Exhibit A of the MOU is replaced by Exhibit E of the Global Settlement, <br />which is attached as Exhibit 4 to this Agreement. <br />C. The definition of “Litigating Local Governments” in Section A.4 of the <br />MOU shall mean Local Governments that filed suit against one or more of <br />the Settling Defendants prior to May 3, 2022. The Litigating Local <br />Governments are listed on Exhibit B of the Distributors Settlement, and <br />are referred to as Litigating Subdivisions in the Distributors Settlement. <br />D. The definition of “National Settlement Agreement” in Section A.6 of the <br />MOU shall mean the Global Settlement. <br />E. The definition of “Settlement” in Section A.14 of the MOU shall mean the <br />Distributors Settlement. <br />F. The MOU is amended to add new Section C.4.g.vii, which provides as <br />follows: <br />“If a Participating Local Government receiving a direct payment <br />(a) uses Opioid Funds other than as provided for in the Distributors <br />Settlement, (b) does not comply with conditions for receiving <br />direct payments under the MOU, or (c) does not promptly submit <br />necessary reporting and compliance information to its Regional <br />Opioid Abatement Counsel (“Regional OAC”) as defined at <br />Section C.4.h of the MOU, then the Regional OAC may suspend <br />direct payments to the Participating Local Government after <br />notice, an opportunity to cure, and sufficient due process. If direct <br />payments to Participating Local Government are suspended, the <br />payments shall be treated as if the Participating Local Government <br />is foregoing their allocation of Opioid Funds pursuant to Section <br />C.4.d and C.4.j.iii of the MOU. In the event of a suspension, the <br />Regional OAC shall give prompt notice to the suspended <br />Participating Local Government and the Settlement Fund <br />Administrator specifying the reasons for the suspension, the <br />process for reinstatement, the factors that will be considered for <br />reinstatement, and the due process that will be provided. A <br />suspended Participating Local Government may apply to the <br />Regional OAC to be reinstated for direct payments no earlier than <br />five years after the suspension.” <br />G. Consistent with how attorney fee funds for outside counsel for <br />Participating Local Subdivisions are being administered in most states <br />across the country, the Government Fee Fund (“GFF”) set forth in the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.