Laserfiche WebLink
NOTE: "Receiving No." to be shown in the upper right hand corner on each page of the plat (if <br />more than one page). (Ord. 2005-31, 2005) <br /> <br /> <br />Chapter 16.28 <br />DEVELOPMENT OF ILLEGALLY DIVIDED LAND <br />Sections <br />16.28.010 Application approval. <br />16.28.020 Innocent purchaser for value. <br />16.28.010 Application approval. <br />No application for a building permit, septic tank permit or other development permit for any lot, <br />tract or parcel of land divided in violation of state law or this title shall be granted without prior <br />approval of the board. Such approval shall only be given following a public meeting at which the <br />applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that: <br />1. The county sanitarian has certified that the proposed means of sewage disposal and water <br />supply on and to the lot, tract, or parcel are adequate; <br />2. The county engineer has certified that the lot, tract or parcel is served with an adequately <br />designed means of ingress and egress, and with adequate drainage facilities, none of <br />which interfere with or impair existing or planned public highway and drainage facilities <br />in the vicinity; <br />3. The planning commission has certified that the proposed development conforms to the <br />comprehensive plan and all zoning regulations; <br />4. The proposed development will not adversely affect the safety, health or welfare of <br />adjacent property owners, or interfere with their enjoyment of their property. (Ord. 2005- <br />31, 2005) <br />16.28.020 Innocent purchaser for value. <br />An application for a building permit, on site sewage permit or other development permit for any <br />lot, tract or parcel of land divided in violation of state law or this title shall not be granted <br />without prior approval of the board, which approval shall only be given following a public <br />meeting at which the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that: <br />1. The applicant purchased the lot, tract, or parcel for value; <br />2. The applicant did not know, and could not have known by the exercise of care which a <br />reasonable purchaser would have used in purchasing the land, that the lot, tract or parcel <br />had been part of a larger lot, tract, or parcel divided in violation of state law or this title. <br />(Ord. 2005-31, 2005) <br /> <br />