My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution_DOE Covenant_Lower Co Shop
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
02. February
>
2022-02-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Resolution_DOE Covenant_Lower Co Shop
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 1:06:00 PM
Creation date
2/10/2022 1:01:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/15/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
o
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Chair's Signature on the Washington State Department of Ecology Restrictive Covenant at the Lower County Public Works Maintenance Shop
Order
15
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
86034
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 7, 2019 | Page 3 File No. 0504-119-01 <br />Purge water generated during groundwater sampling was drummed and labeled for future disposal at a <br />permitted facility. <br />4.3. Monitored Natural Attenuation Parameters <br />Water quality parameters, including turbidity, DO, ORP, specific conductivity, pH, and temperature were <br />measured in the field using a calibrated water quality meter equipped with a flow-through cell and the <br />results are summarized in Table 1 below. Relatively low DO and ORP levels at MW-2, within the former UST <br />basin indicate the potential reducing conditions that support bioremediation. The ORP levels in the <br />upgradient well (MW-1) and downgradient wells (MW-5 and MW-6), are elevated; as is ORP in MW-3 which <br />is closer but cross-gradient to the former UST area. DO is high in MW-1 and MW-6, moderately high in MW- <br />3 and low in MW-4 and MW-5, possibly indicating an anaerobic zone extending from MW-2 to MW-5. <br />TABLE 1. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER AND GROUNDWATER QUALITY PARAMETERS <br />Monitoring <br />Well ID <br />Depth to Water and Field Measured Natural Attenuation Parameters <br />Depth <br />to <br />Water <br />(feet) <br />Groundwater <br />Elevation <br />(feet) <br />pH <br />(pH <br />units) <br />Specific <br />Conductivity <br />(mS/cm) <br />ORP <br />(mV) <br />Dissolved <br />Oxygen <br />(mg/L) <br />Turbidity1 <br />(NTU) <br />Temperature <br />(degrees C) <br />MW-1 3.80 1,573.84 7.08 0.568 166.7 2.75 10.4 7.0 <br />MW-2 3.70 1,573.38 6.66 0.689 130.5 1.22 4.8 5.5 <br />MW-3 3.86 1,573.16 6.94 0.814 168.8 0.80 4.9 8.4 <br />MW-4 4.43 1,572.29 7.14 0.733 140.5 0.97 2.6 12.7 <br />MW-5 4.39 1,569.84 7.08 1.152 170.5 1.39 9.4 8.3 <br />MW-6 4.98 1,571.49 7.29 0.647 164.3 6.26 4.1 9.4 <br />Notes: <br />1Turbidity is not a natural attenuation parameter but was measured in the field to evaluate groundwater stabilization. <br />2 Groundwater elevations calculated using the formula: Groundwater Elevation = Top of Casing Elevation - Depth to Water <br />mS/cm = milliSiemens per centimeter; mV = millivolts; mg/L = milligrams per liter; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units <br />5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br />Six groundwater samples, and one duplicate, were submitted to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses <br />described in “Section 3.0 Scope of Services.” This section presents the analytical results for groundwater <br />samples collected during the January 2019 monitoring event. <br />5.1. Groundwater Chemical Analytical Results <br />Six groundwater samples, and one duplicate, were submitted from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 <br />to TestAmerica for the chemical analyses described in “Section 3.0 Scope of Services.” The duplicate <br />sample was collected from monitoring well MW-2. TestAmerica’s laboratory report is included in Appendix B; <br />chemical analytical results are summarized and compared to MTCA Method A cleanup levels for <br />unrestricted land use in Table 2 and summarized below. Contaminants were not detected in the samples <br />collected from MW-1 through MW-6.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.