My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DV-19-00001 Marian Meadows Development Agreement
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
11. November
>
2021-11-16 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
DV-19-00001 Marian Meadows Development Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2021 12:40:20 PM
Creation date
11/10/2021 12:37:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
11/16/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution for the Meadows Development Agreement Resolution (DV-19-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
83269
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lindsay Ozbolt <br />October 30, 2019 <br />Page 6 <br />the District, the County and ERLC were so far apart that no consensus was reached. It <br />was ultimately agreed that the best approach was to proceed toward the Development <br />Agreement with an opportunity for all parties to provide documentation to the BOCC. <br />The lawsuit was dismissed early in December 2018. <br />Unfortunately, there is no reason to believe that ERLC and the District are any closer to <br />meeting minds now than when the lawsuit began. The District's July 22, 2019 comments <br />to Community Development Services "protests" the $500 mitigation fee in the <br />Application, but the District does not offer another mitigation, let alone legal rationale or <br />analysis in support. The District does not explain why their "calculations" differ so much <br />from the enrollment projections of OPSI. The District does not explain why this <br />developer should pay for the District's choice to not seek mitigation from prior <br />developments. The District does not explain why, with a current enrollment of 112 and a <br />projected addition of 53 students from Marian Meadows, that ERLC should pay the cost <br />of constructing a new elementary school when their current facility is fit for 225 students. <br />Finally, the District provides no support for its claim that the imposition of a $500 <br />mitigation fee without the District's input would somehow violate the Ordinance and the <br />Settlement Agreement. The District simply again objects without providing any <br />substantive input. There is simply no evidence to support any concern that Marian <br />Meadows would compromise the District's ability to provide for its students. To the <br />contrary, ERLC's offer of mitigation is entirely reasonable, consistent with mitigation <br />reached by the immediately adjacent school district for residential development, and <br />within the bounds of the law. <br />cerely, <br />Duana T. Kolougkova <br />Direct Tel: (425) 467-9966 <br />Email: kCllOuskoya a immlaw.com <br />531-001 Response to DislrietComment 10-15-19.docx <br />TOHNS•MONROL -MITSLTAAGA•KOLOUSKOVA - PLLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.