Laserfiche WebLink
There are six amendments proposed to update Section 178.07.030 Permit Exemptions <br />Item 2019-a proposes to add the cost threshold for building freshwater docks to developments <br />exempt from shoreline substantial development permitting process, located in KCC <br />17B.07.030(2Xh). <br />Item 2019-c proposes to update KCC 178.07.030(2XpXiv) to list all fish habitat enhancement <br />project criteria, as found in RCW 77.55.181(1XaXi-iv). <br />Item 2017-a proposes to update the cost threshold for substantial development from $6,416 to <br />$7 ,047 , as adjusted by the Office of Financial Management. <br />Item 2017-c proposes to add clarifying exemption language to KCC 178.07.030, for compliance <br />with Ecology's exemption rules. The amendment proposes to add exemptions for remedial actions <br />pursuant to RCW 90.58.355; boatyard improvements necessary to meet NPDES permit <br />requirements; WSDOT facility maintenance and safety improvements; projects consistent with <br />RCW 90.58.045; and projects authorized via the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council process. <br />Item 2016-a proposes to add exemption language to KCC 178.07.030(2) for retrofitting existing <br />structures to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. <br />Item 2007-c proposes to add all fish habitat enhancement project criteria as found in RCW <br />77 .55.181 (1XaXi-iv) to KCC 1 7B.07.030(2XpXiv). <br />Final SMP Draft <br />1 78.07.030 Permit Exemptions. <br />1. General provisions. <br />a. Only those uses a nd developments that meet the precise terms of one (1) or more of <br />the listed exemptions may be granted exemption from the substantial development <br />permit process. <br />b. An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption <br />from compliance with the Act or Master Program or from any other regulatory <br />requirements. <br />c. The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit process is <br />on the applicant. <br />d. lf any part of a proposed use or development is not eligible for exemption, then a <br />substantial development permit is required for the entire proposal. <br />e. Conditions may be attached to the approval of exempted uses or developments as <br />necessary to assure consistency of the project with the Act and the Master Program. <br />2, Developments exempt from shoreline substantial development permitting process. <br />Subject to the general provisions above, exempt activities include those set forth in WAC <br />173-27-040(2) and RCW 90.58.030, as amended: <br />Exhibit C SMP Update | 178.07.030 Permit Exemptions Page 2 of 10