My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord-2021-006
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
05. May
>
2021-05-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Ord-2021-006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2021 11:52:29 AM
Creation date
5/20/2021 11:48:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
5/18/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
e
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance Concerning the Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Required by RCW 90.58.080(4)
Order
5
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
76503
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
340
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />measures <br />Generally, the harder the construction measure, the greater the impact on shoreline <br />processes, including sediment transport, geomorphology, and biological functions. <br />Additionally, hard structures, especially vertical walls, often create conditions that lead <br />to failure of the structure. Failed bulkheads and walls adversely impact beach <br />aesthetics, may be a safety or navigational hazard, and may adversely impact shoreline <br />ecological functions. <br />A. Policies <br />1. Nonstructural alternatives of stabilization should be encouraged over structural <br />methods, whenever possible. Such alternatives may include no action, increased <br />building setbacks, building relocation, drainage controls, and bioengineering, including <br />vegetative stabilization. <br />2. New structures should be located and designed to avoid the need for future shoreline <br />stabilization where feasible. New lots created through short plat or subdivision should <br />be designed to assure that future use or development on the created lots will not <br />require structural shoreline stabilization for reasonable use or development to occur. <br />3. New or expanded structural shoreline stabilization should be permitted only where <br />demonstrated to be necessary to protect an existing primary structure that is in <br />imminent danger of loss or substantial damage, and where mitigation of impacts <br />would not cause a net loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes. <br />4. New or expanded structural shoreline stabilization for ecological enhancement, <br />restoration, or hazardous substance remediation projects should be allowed only <br />when non-structural measures, vegetation planting, or on-site drainage improvements <br />would be insufficient to achieve enhancement, restoration or remediation objectives. <br />5. Shoreline stabilization should not interfere with public access to shorelines. <br />6. New shoreline stabilization should not cause significant impacts to adjacent or down- <br />current properties. <br />7. Shoreline stabilization should be developed in a coordinated manner among affected <br />property owners and public agencies. Where erosion threatens existing uses or <br />developments, a comprehensive program for shoreline management should be <br />established. <br />8. Non-regulatory methods to protect, enhance, and restore shoreline ecological <br />functions and other shoreline resources should be encouraged for shoreline <br />stabilization. Non-regulatory methods may include public facility and resource <br />planning, technical assistance, education, voluntary enhancement and restoration <br />projects, or other incentive programs. <br />Chapter 6 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />124
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.